Theories of Mythology.

Holan approves that in epoch of a Neolithic Age there was a religion, in the basic positions uniform for an extensive area cultures of Forward Asia and Southeast Europe and rendering influence on the next less advanced regions. The basic deities of this religion: the goddess of the sky and the god of the ground, and also their children (the god of growth, the god - benefactor, brothers - twins and their sister the goddess of the sun). (Holan, 1992. - p. 12).

The Idea that a role of the Great goddess (so she is named still by antique authors), it is impossible to limit to sphere of the ground, is represented true (shall recollect even cloudy wives and maidens of late folklore). She was considered as Mistress a rain and moisture, the mistress of animals, Mistress lives and death. A symbol of her was a circle (turned into a ring). The goddess was personified by such animals, as a bird (for example, a cuckoo - see. Holan, 1992, 173), also insects - the butterfly, a bee (all - air elements!) etc. Her spouse the master of a bottom (the god of the ground or the Underworld) in two images were usual (the snake or an animal); and heavenly (an eagle, the hawk, a kite) - when he rose to the spouse. Holan considers, that attitudes between this spouses were completely not idyllic, and during one of quarrels the goddess of the sky has dumped on the ground of the spouse from what that has gone lame (Holan, 1992, 191).

Holan do not precise differentiation between selected with him "the god of the earth" and the master Underworld. Sometimes he speaks about them as about a uniform deity, symbolised both the bull, and predators like a leopard, a lion, and a wolf. But a stumbling-block for similar mixture there is popular in art of the Ancient East a plot torment the bull a lion. " Very much can be, that in the Bottom Mesopotamia (taking place, by the way, in the neighbourhood with Elam) the bull and a lion - images Neolithic Age the god of the ground and Underworld - were represented to epoch of a Neolithic Age two different deities. Can be, they were considered consisting in relationship and both used respect. <...> Though the bull was esteemed as divine embodiment the Earth, on mythological representations he could be killed by other representative of "bottom". But the death of the bull was time: in 40 days his constellation again appeared above horizon, and people exulted concerning revival of the god " (Holan, 1992, 55). " At last, it is possible, that Mesopotamian the bull killed by a lion, it not the god of the ground, and the god of vegetation <...> Here Could affect and that circumstance, that images of deities of the ground and vegetation in general precisely are not differentiated, quite often mixing up in myths (and, by the way, in graphic symbolics) " (Holan, 1992, 67). The god of vegetation, according to Holan, was represented in an image of the ram, whose horns remind sprouts to a seed. From here nearby and till an image of a deer - symbolizing god of the benefactor.

The god - benefactor was thought then in an image of the deer connected to elements of the ground. " There Are ancient figures on which deer horns are treated as vegetative forms (fig. 63 : 6). Such association could arise and because of similarity deer horns with branches and consequently, that the deer dumps horns an autumn, and new at it grow is similar to annual revival of vegetation " (Holan, 1992, 40) in the spring. " So, we come to a conclusion about the maintenance of the most ancient cosmogonies myth explaining rising and a sunset: the deer (an essence belonging to the ground) has stolen the sun - maiden in the underground world and ran with her on the sky. Angry the lord of the Underworld has pursued a deer, has struck him and has returned the captive back " (Holan, 1992, 42). " The wonderful deer, which has stolen the sun - maiden for, has turned to the hero this to people the sun, light, fire. And then he became in general the benefactor of people who have attached them and to other values: agriculture, craft, knowledge." (Holan, 1992, 44). From a deer bearing from under the ground the sun, nearby and up to a boat transporting souls died and up to a horse, carrying out the same function. Holan writes, that later the horse has replaced a deer in his role mediator (with. 49 - 50).

Holan believes, that "Neolithic religion" as the system existed up to 3 - the beginnings 2 thousand before Indo-Europeans intrusion and some other peoples, "... Therefore in Europe and Forward Asia the culture of the most ancient farmers was destroyed, the Stone Age was replaced bronze, new peoples were formed and distributed Indo-European languages, beliefs were changed, and the former cult symbols was adapted to other religious views." (Holan, 1992, 10).

Sights Holan are original, but attempt of decoding will unexpectedly be coordinated to them Celt images on the well-known boiler from Gundestrup which was undertaken by the French scientist Jean Jacque Hatt. It will be in detail considered in the chapter devoted Celt to mythology. In brief, Hatt speaks about the following basic characters Celt mythology: the god of thunder Taranis ; the god connected to Earthly elements Cernunnos ; to the goddess - their spouse; divine hero Smertrius; the god of sky Teutat . Òàðàíèñ, being jealous the goddess, íàñûëàåò on it(her) of monstrous volko-dogs. That, wishing to disappear, turns to a bird. Smertrius (Cernunnos's supporter) kills a dog. Then, the coalition of gods (where enters and Teutat) sends army on protection of the goddess. Taranis, in turn, sends dogs to grasp certain sacred bull, but Smertrius again leaves the winner and the goddess returns the natural shape.

Semantic crossings of conclusions Hatt and Holan are interesting. The thunder god Taranis can correspond air image of lords of the Underworld. Pair: Cernunnos and Smertrius vividly remind the god of growth or the god of the ground (in the event that to understand the last separately from the lord of the Underworld) and the god - benefactor. Both Cernunnos, and Smertrius suffered from anger Taranis. Are important here and animal symbols: a deer and bull (Cernunnos), predatory animal Taranis (variant "torment"), birds of the goddess. Analysis by Hatt reveals not only Earthly, but also heavenly began goddesses - mothers (that corresponds to Holan's concept).

It is necessary to tell that Hatt and Holan concepts as though supplement each other. The first has offered the concrete analysis of monuments of the fine arts Celt to mythology. The second - On the most extensive material of cultures of the world he has tried to reveal the second structure of global mythology, which sources saw in "Neolithic religions". At all interest and importance of conclusions Holan, they frequently seem too courageous - the disorder of cultures to which monuments considered by the scientist belong is too great. Besides at acquaintance to work Holan does not leave a thought that exarticulation by the scientist of initial deities is carried out faster by a sensual - shaped principle.

Fantalov Alex

CULTURE of BARBAROUS EUROPE: TYPOLOGY of MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGES



The scholars of Indo-European cultures and mythologies:

Studying mythology within the limits of the European tradition of knowledge began in epoch of classical Greece (philosophic-symbolical concept Platon was rather interesting). In epoch of Middle Ages Christianity treatment to this subject was negative. Revival of interest to mythology has taken place from Renaissance. Thus, though separate concepts surpassed time (are those, for example, were sights J. Vico which believed, that the myth in ancient epoch comprised all aspects of culture), as a whole, is necessary to attribute the beginning of the scientific analysis of myths to middle of 19 centuries. Then there were two large scientific schools: sun-moon where gods were treated as symbols sun-moon objects or the meteorological phenomena and cultural - anthropological school resisting to it, whose representatives investigated archaic tribes of South America, Equatorial Africa and Oceania.

The solaristic-meteorological school represents significant interest from the point of view of the present research as its representatives used a comparative-historical method. This method was borrowed from comparative Indo-European linguistics which actively developed from the end of 18 centuries. It meant a generality of an origin Indo-European peoples and relationship of their languages occurring from certain "parent language", existing in the remote past. Representatives of sun-mythological school (A. Kun, V. Shvarz, A.N. Afanas'ev, etc.) have applied F.I. Buslaev this method to studying Indo-European mythologies, and such approach has not lost the value and today.

The brightest spokesman of cultural - anthropological school were E. Taylor and J. Fraser - authors, accordingly, animystical and ritualistic theories of a myth. Representation is typical of this direction about a myth as about pre-scientific an explanation of the phenomena of world around. Despite of many important ideas and the valuable ethnographic material collected by representatives of cultural - anthropological school, such sight represents the certain recourse.

The Twentieth century is characterised by attention to psychological aspects of a myth. On this basis such influential concepts, as the theory primitive thinking Levi Broulle, the theory mythical creation were created with the purpose of rescue from fear before M. Eliade's history, structuralistic theory of a myth of K. Levi-Straus etc.

It is necessary to recognise significant achievements of the mentioned scientists in the field of the analysis of features of mythological thinking, reflection in myths of space and time. Nevertheless, from the point of view of the present research the greatest interest is represented with works, whose authors concentrate the attention to concrete mythological characters as these characters and the plots connected to them are the basic maintenance of any mythology. Here again there is a problem of interpretation of concept " the mythological character ".

Answers to this question in different epoch could be various. Originally "god", "hero", "demon" were thought as the real-life subjects distinguished from the person only by that were, on L.N. Gumilev words, on the order is more perfect than him as people are more perfect than ants. In process of development of a civilisation (both in the West, and in the East) there were sceptical moods. We see the ironical attitude to images of ancient Greek gods at Aristophan and Lucian or representation about gods as the idolised historical figures at Eugemer.

Alongside with it there was also other tendency connected to the general channel of formation of world religions (we shall recollect Platon's "ideas"). The god in an Islam or Christianity (partly and in Zoroastrianism) is supreme essence. At an uncooperative altitude to Paganism on the part of adherents of monotheism, it is necessary to tell that traces of ancient mythological images are widely submitted in world religions. First, Ahuramazda , Allah or a Christian Trinity comprise the numerous aspects Indo-European or Semitic gods. Second, world religions mean presence of the whole classes of supernatural essences, and in some it is possible to distinguish former pagan gods.

In New time, in connection with secularisation interest to mythological primary sources, on the one hand, has quickened, with another - they were interpreted, as a rule, in the reduced, allegorical kind. Simultaneously with it there was an interesting tendency to treat images of ancient gods as poetic metaphors which originates in 13 century (Sturluson's Edda). Especially this tendency was developed in epoch of romanticism and neo-romanticism.

In the twentieth century significant influence on understanding of a problem of interpretation of concept " the mythological character " rendered K.G. Jung. Such Jung's archetypes as "anime", "animus", "mother", "wise old man" partly it is possible to interpret as prototypes of characters of all world mythology. At all importance of such installation which in eyes of the modern person as though will rehabilitate mythology, giving it intellectual support, it is necessary to note, that the Swiss scientist was, first of all, the psychoanalyst that has imposed very strong print on all this concept. To present time still know about mental processes that on this basis to build global concepts more few.

Therefore, while it is represented to more lawful to treat mythological characters from the point of view closer to sociological - gods as an embodiment of social forces and structures (this approach was planned in E. Durkgejm 's 19 century).

For achievement of the purpose put in the present research, are very important was to familiarise with the works studying concrete European and is wider - Indo-European than mythology. In spite of the fact that we in the country and abroad have the extensive scientific literature investigating mythologies of various peoples of Europe, in a domestic science attempt of their complex studying on a basis of simultaneously textual and graphic material was not undertaken yet. Besides in most cases, scientists work within the framework of one ethnic culture, though it is known that really to understand a subject or the phenomenon it is possible only in comparison with similar for it.

Researches frequently geographically are located in the countries in which territory there is no time lived these peoples. In the attitude the Celts we see, that on continent scientists of France were engaged in studying of their culture first of all (J. Hatt) and Czech (J. Filip). Island Celt culture was studied, accordingly, by Britains (item Mac Cane). To this question showed interest scientific USA (F. Bober), by virtue of that in territory of this country large Irish and Scottish communities live.

The numerous works have devoted to the German-Scandinavian culture Scandinavian (B. Almgren, E. Oxenstirna, S. Lindkvist etc.), German (F. Hoysler), English (E. Davidson, A. Evans) experts. In Russia above this theme worked as A. Gurevich, E. Meletinsky, M. Steblin-Kamensky.

The scolars of Bulgaria (in H.Danov, M.Tsoncheva), Romania and Moldova (I. Nikulitse) studied Thracian-Dacian.

Above studying of culture of Scythians and the Sarmatians lived in South-Russian steppes Rissian researchers (as V. Abaev, M. Artamonov, D. Raevsky, S. Jatsenko) worked mainly. In east Slavs also the Russian science (B Ribacov, V. Sedov, V. Propp - let alone such classics, as A. Afanas'ev and F. Buslaev) while concerning the western Slavs the priority belongs German (J.Herman) and Czech (L.Niderle) to scientists.

Balt culture were engaged in N. Velius, M. Gimbutas (living in USA) etc.

As to cultures with which at modern peoples alive communication(connection) here not all so is unequivocal has interrupted. For example, strong schools Etruscology have developed, for example, in Germany (Ý. Gerhard, item. Court, E.Rashinger) and Russia (P. Modestov, A. Nemirovsky). The same can be told and about cultures the Hittities and the Zoroastrian Persians.

Among the scientists engaged in research the Indo-European mythologies as a whole, J. Dumezil, the author of the so-called three-functional theory uses the greatest popularity. His idea basis on fact that primary gods of the Indo-Europeans should be grouped on functions: magic authority, military force, fertility (the pantheon represented a society projection as Dumezil saw it). At all beauty and logicality and wide popular (ideas Dumezil use in the constructions many intellectuals of Europe - on the one hand - "new right philosophers", on the second hand - their antipode - "mondialist" Jacque Attali) this theory is a little bit artificial and causes disputes. In particular, it is known, that the gods connected to sphere of fertility, had in most cases magic function (and, frequently and military). Nevertheless, extensiveness of erudition and the deep analysis of the French scientist have enriched a science with many valuable conclusions. Besides, as fairly marks Mac Cane " irrespective of its central thesis, theory Dumezil gives reason for existence of the coordinated system of the gods inherited from Indo-Europeans of the past... " (Mac Cana, 1973).

In a domestic science Indo-Europeans mythologies are engaged in reconstruction of the most ancient In. Ivanov and In. Toporov. They, as well as Dumezil, investigate basically mythological texts. Using principles of structural linguistics, Ivanov and Axes allocate some circles of the mythological characters described by a generality of fields of activity and, especially, the names which are going back to uniform Indo-European roots (for example: deiuo-" the day time shining sky "; perk-"thunder"; uel-connected to the world dead; iemo-"twin"; s (a) uel-"sun"; trit-, dhon-and (mo)-mer-the deities connected to water and the bottom world). These researches are of great importance. However, at all breadth of the scientific review, Ivanov and Axes almost did not concern the Celts and German (also as Dumezil did not mention mythology Balt and Slavs). Behind frameworks of their work there was, for example, such chain of gods, as Hermes - Odin - Lugh , genetically close, but having the names not connected among themselves (as frequently the mythological character started named not on a primary name, and one of epithets - that complicates work of the linguist).

Thus, at all variety of works existing in the world scientific literature on this subjects, they or have local character, or concentrate the attention to any one side of art culture (as a rule, texts). And you see in definition of a structural nucleus of mythology studying of monuments of the fine arts which allows to fill in many lacunas of a textual material is capable to play very important role also and to give other time cuts that helps to see mythological images in development. In comparison of these both sides of art culture feature of this work also consists. Thus it bases on maximum broad audience of researches and considers all existing cultures of Barbarous Europe both many related Mediterranean and Asian cultures.

The Baltic and Slavic history and mythology:

Baltic peoples in the pantheon have kept all basic mythological types. The god of Clear Sky is Dievas, to the God of the Thunder - is Perkunas, the God of Earth Powers - Veln/Vels (Prussian Patollo), to the Cultural Hero - Sovius; to the Great Goddess - Zemes mate, and also some other. Is evident, that at full structure of Balt pantheon, the type of the Cultural Hero is be relative undeveloped. The western representatives of the given cultural world - the Prussians above all put the embodiment of the God of Earth Powers - Patollo. It is known, that there priests played dominant role, comparable on power and religious refinement with Celtic druids. East Balts (it is especial Lithuanians) where ruled by princes, venerated the God of Thunder (that, probably, it is connected to influence of the Vikings and Thor's cult). Not probably, the Prussians lost independence (similarly to Celtics) by but the Lithuanians preserved their independence and organised state.

It is necessary to note that among Slavic peoples in the most full structure the pantheon of east Slavs is known. To the god of the Clear Sky corresponds Svarog, to the God of Thunder - Perun , to the God of Earth Powers - Veles , to the Cultural Hero - Dazhbog / Yarila, the Great Goddess - Mokos , Lada and others. Thus, especial development worship the Cultural Hero has achieved in western Slav mythology: actually, the majority of their known gods (Svantevit, Herovit, Porevit etc.) can be considered as an embodiment of this type.

German-Scandinavians.

German people appear much later the Celts in a history. Actually, this name the Romans have started to use since 1 century b. D. One of the first displays of " the German spirit " steel of act of the Kymbres and the Teuthonics (the truth, they, probably, belonged to peoples, intermediate between the Celts and Germanics). The Teuthonics aspired to establish the control above Celticum, but eventually were exterminated by the Romans. The same fate has comprehended above mentioned Ariovist. Power of Rome grew and in 1-th c. A. D. Tiberius occupied the grounds between Rhine and Elba. The answer became creation of "power" barbarian king Marobod it covered territories of present Poland, Czech and East Germany, number of Marobod's soldiers reached 70 thousandes and revolt of the Heruscian leader, destroyed in Teuthoburg wood three Roman legions. Retaliatory Roman expeditions in common have not reached the purpose. The organized machine of the Roman regular army finally appeared powerless German have proved, that if people has will to struggle, it in a condition to keep independence.

However, the German tribes did not wish to obey and to own kings. Marobod was expelled. On two one century between empire and Free Germany the balance interrupted, certainly, by conflicts was established.

New epoch has come in middle 3-th c. A. D. - so-called Great resettlement of peoples. Rome was in a condition of a political collapse, and among German young aggressive peoples which L. Gumilev counted generation ethnic a push have appeared: Allemanes, Goths and Francs. To two the big future was fated to last. According to the gothic historian of 6 centuries to Jordan, the Goths and Vandals occured from Southern Scandinavia. They have landed in a mouth of Vistula and have gradually promoted up to Black Sea. Then Goths, having used Bospor ships, have plundered Greece and coast of Asia Minor. In 4 century, in territory of the East Europe there was an extensive power Hermanarih. However Goths have not got on with many local ethnoses (behind exception Alanians) and were expelled hunns. They have found a refuge on the grounds of empire, but with that поры represented permanent threat to Rome. Finally, Westgoths have grasped Gallia and Iberia (Spain), and Ostgoths - Illyria and Italy. Other tribes did not lag behind also: Francs, Vandals, Anglo-Saxons, Herules, Friezes...

Participation of ancient German in numerous wars and often change of places has had an effect on social structure. At these tribes it was not kept ancient Indo-Europeans estates of priests and leaders, or most important people carried out religious practices. By virtue of it, and also early Christianisation (which on continent passed not so softly), the German mythology has not reached us in the protogenic kind. But its Scandinavian variant was kept.

The Scandinavian tribes behind exception it is ready have not taken part in Great resettlement of peoples. These years they showed relative peaceful disposition. Ancestors of Swedes have formed strong Sweden power (described still Tacitus). With 5-th A. D. it enters into a strip economic and cultural blossoming - so-called the Vendel period. Cultural communications of the Scandinavians are distributed from British isles up to Average Volga. In art has developed international "Vendel style" in which are traced both Roman and east (Sarmatian) influence. For its creation the Irish tradition had special value. As intermediaries between Scandinavians and the Celts at this time Anglo-Saxons, probably, acted. But the original centre of the new art covering the European continent up to Frank power and Italy was Sweden and its such centres, as Uppsala, Valcgarde, and Vendel.

However, the period of prosperity and relative rest the event which reminded epoch of Resettlement of peoples and has received the name has replaced " movement of Vikings " (the word "Vikings" occurs whether from "vik" - " a bay, having filled ", whether from "vikingr" - " the pirate, the robber "). Victims of their attacks became England, Ireland, France, Northern Germany, Iberian Peninsula, and Southern Italy. It is known significant, though also an ambiguous role of the Vikings in creation of the Kiev Russia.

The Vikings have opened and have occupied Iceland. Its development had key value for preservation of the Scandinavian mythology. Here it is necessary to mean that the culture of Vikings developed already in Christian time, representing some kind of "overdue flowers northern paganism Retraction of Scandinavians in life of continental Europe entailed their christening quite often accompanied with cultural excesses. In Iceland this process occurred rather peacefully (as well as in Ireland), here long time exist pagan belief, and then ancient gods went in the category of poetic metaphors.

From the point of view of safety of mythology of the Scandinavians are similar the mythology of the Celts . On the one hand, it is a grandiose layer of the pagan arts and crafts categorised as several historical periods. Most significant of these periods were: the Period of great resettlement of peoples (3 - 5-th c. A. D.), left well-known bracteats - gold metal plates, the Vendel period (5 - 8-th c. A. D.) from it it is magnificent ornamented with the weapon; Century of vikings (the end 8 - 11-th c. A. D.) when well-known images on stones and monuments wood grooves were created.

On the other hand, it is texts. Scandinavians had Iceland becoming for them same container of the mythology what for the Celts Ireland was. (In general it is noticed, that on islands relic forms, and not only cultures, but also a nature) more often are kept. And again, a positive role the Christianity with its traditional learning here has played. In 13-th c. A. D. in Iceland two remarkable books were created. She is "Elder Edda" and "Younger Edda". The first represents the anonymous collection mythological, ephic and didactic songs. The second, belonging well-known Sturluson and being on a plan the textbook skaldic poetry, as a matter of fact, is the prosaic and structured transposition of the significant case of myths. Thus it is very important, that both "Eddas" include the major creative and echatologic myths. The Grammar adjoins to these monuments (also mentioning ancient gods, though and in eugemeric interpretation) and a number skaldic verses and work by Danish historian Saxon. Time break between a textual and graphic material is not so great as at the Celts, that also facilitates studying mythologies.

 

Odin is creating the world. (A. Fantalov, painting in oil).

Bronze Age: history, culture, mythology.

Menu

The Celts.

There are various hypotheses of formation Celts as historical people. According to earlier, ancestors of people came in the Central Europe from Black See.

 However now the majority of researchers are declined to a hypothesis authochtonic origins the Celts in area between Average Rhein and Average Danube to 7-th c. BD In 6 century BD hordes of the Celts have terrorized Europe having carried by on the fighting chariots on territory of modern France, Spain, Britain.

The Earth present France began to refer to on their name as Gallia (the Celts, Gauls, Galatians - all this different forms the same ethnonym). This country became a core Celt the grounds and base of new expansion, this time to the east. People of leader Bellovez have crushed Etruscian towns in a valley of the river Po (about 397 BD).

The history included their sensational, but unsuccessful storm of Rome and an episode with geese (about 390 BD). More perspective ones were actions of those Gauls that were moved to Orient. They have occupied Bohemia (Czech) and pool of Average Danube (due to that the army Alexander the Great acted the East). Then, having taken advantage of easing of Macedonia after civil war, the Celts have destroyed an army of its king Ptolemeus Keravn and have plundered Greece. Under the invitation of one of king they were forwarded to Asia Minor. It is necessary to say; that Hellenistic kings willingly employed the Celts on service, appreciating their specific military skills (it is possible, similar to what are used in east fighting arts). But the Celts (here them named Galatians) have unexpectedly formed the own state in the centre of Asia Minor, having organised on a sample of Gallia. And, at last, approximately in the same period, the Celts have occupied Ireland.

During 3 centuries BD the Celts have started to suffer defeats. Ease of gains harboured danger. Huge distances weakened lines of the communications. The Celts could not develop own statehood. The governors who have recovered from defeats of the organised powers (Rome, Macedonia, Pergamum, to Syria) began to repulse them. Then the Celts have started the development conquered territories. Their cities (the first in Europe to the north from the Alps!) And settlements incorporated a network of roads. There was advanced river navigation. Gaulishes in Brittany built the big wooden ships supplied with leather sails and anchor circuits, much better adapted to navigation in the high sea, than antique galeries. In the political point of mind Celticum on former represented a conglomerate of breeding associations led by "kings" and aristocracy which lived in castles and, similarly to medieval nobility, passionately loved horses and dog hunting.

But the supreme authority belonged to estate of the priests having the uniform organisation. They shared on three categories. Druids formed the highest caste - creators myths and directors of rituals. Filides carried out functions of lawyers, they kept an ancient history of the country closely bound with mythology in memory. At last, bards in the verses glorified military leaders and heroes. According to Caesar, Gaulish druids did not trust a written word and kept huge volume of the information in memory. It is no surprising, that the period of training of the druid reached 20 years. In Ireland the similar period was shorter - than seven years.

But time of domination the Celts on continent left. From the east they were restricted with wild German tribes. In the south gathered force Rome more and more.

 In 121 BD the Romans occupied Southern France. In the same time, two tribes - Cimvres and Teutonians have intruded in Celt Gallia because of Rhine.

It was ruined. And then have come fatal for the Celts 60-50 BD Burebista, tsar Deacons has destroyed or has expelled them from the Central Europe; Ariovist, the German leader has superseded them from Germany. And, at last, Caesar has made the dizzy campaign and for some years has subdued Gallia - a core Celt the grounds. This country has quickly come under influence of the Roman civilisation. Its population has received the name Gaulo-Romans - that is the Gauls living under the Roman legislation. Gallia began one of the most advanced and occupied provinces of empire. The estate of priests, which were avocates of independence was destroyed. But reverence Celt gods proceeded, though and within the framework of growing sincretism.

Similar facts has comprehended also all other continental the Celts. Their culture has escaped only on British Isles among Brittons (England) and Scottians (Ireland). So Celticum has come in Middle Ages.

Sources of our knowledge about Celt (and practically any other) mythologies are the literature and the fine arts. Thus as it was already spoken above, they are distributed in time is rather non-uniform. This heterogeneity follows from features Celt histories. For a "barbarous" stage of development on which, as a rule, creation of the well-known eposes richly sated in the mythological images and plots also was carried out, absence of written fixing of these is typical. Sometimes it is connected to absence of writing as such, but is far from being always for it is known, that barbarians adapted the letter of more "advanced" neighbours for the needs. Besides they sometimes, created own, though also primitive writing. Nevertheless, neither in Celtic oghamic the letter, nor on the German fleeces mythological texts were not kept, and there are only data of magic-medical or biographic character. Probably, the reason of "silence" of barbarians is covered in a rigid interdiction of written fixing sacral texts. In exchange, priests cultivated difficult mnemonic approaches. Therefore, after the Roman occupation and destruction of estate of druids, from great Celt religious tradition still would have only obscure descriptions of antique authors, if not two circumstances.

In first there are Gaulish and Gallo-Roman art. It was above said, that the Celts had high craft culture, especially in the field of metallurgy. And the sacral beginning penetrated this culture. In the period Laten - Celtic the Iron Age (6 - 1-th c. BD) Were created numerous products - boilers, grivnas, bracelets, the weapon, richly decorated by mythological images and plots (especially wellknown boiler from Gundestrup). In the subsequent for Laten the Roman Iron Age in territory of Gallia there was a new ethnic generality - the Gallo-Romans, whose religion developed in a channel Roman imperial sincretism. But Roman sincretism everywhere absorbed strong local cults (in Thrace - Thracian ones, Illyria - Illyrian ones, Anatoly - Hittites ones, they in the majority had the blessing general Indo-European roots). And, in Gallia and adjoining areas - Iberia, Britain, Noric (present Slovenia and Croatia) appear numerous statues of gods or the mixed Gallo-Roman character, or is frank Celt.

Second extremely important circumstance in a question of preservation Celt to mythological tradition became the factor of island Celts. The special role here belongs to Ireland. Neither the Roman army has not reached, or the German teams here. Strong influence on life of island rendered the Christian monks who have arrived to Ireland in 4-5 centuries AD. From Egypt, passed Rome. However they have not shown intolerance to local mytho-poethic tradition. On the contrary, taken a place of druids, monks closely co-operated with filides. The last, under the direction of church have written down (approximately by the end 1 thousand AD.) Mythological legends, carrying out. Certainly, something should be removed, in particular the myths connected with cosmology and eschatology (they were in part replaced with plots from the Bible). Nevertheless, the volume of the folklore information kept filides is huge. The separate products named sagas (the term is inexact and taken by modern researchers from the Scandinavian tradition, Irish named them "skel" - stories) are grouped in various attributes.

The modern science allocates the following cycles: mythological , historical, heroic and a cycle of the Finn. The first covers the most ancient period of a history (or pseudo-histories) and is extremely strongly sated with characters in whom ancient gods (and even frequently are guessed and refer to). The historical cycle is longest and continues mythological. Sagas of heroic and historical cycles are grouped around of the certain events and characters (in first case Cuchulain and Conhobar; in the second - around of feats of the hero of the Finn and his army). The narration of both these cycles, in which also there are ancient gods, is limited to rather short time pieces.

Monasteries where manuscripts were kept, have strongly suffered from invasions of Vikings, however tradition lived about 17 centuries when Ireland was won by Cromwel. After that, many manuscripts were forwarded on continent where were kept in the Catholic centres.

The literary heritage of the Brittons is not so great. Their culture developed not in such favorable conditions. At first the Britons have fallen under authority of Rome, then have tested invasion of the German tribes - Angles and Saxons which has resulted in assimilation or destruction of the most part of the population. Bards undertook the role of keepers of ancient learning. They have left a number of products in which we can see numerous parallels to the Irish mythological images (basically, these are wellknown "Mabinogions" - stories for youth). But the basic function of bards was glorification of the successful military leader. So Legendary Arthur became such leader. At 6-th century he has headed struggle against Angles and Saxons, for half-centuries having detained intrusion of Germanics. Gradually, around of his name of the beginnings to be formed the extensive epos, becoming property any more the Britons so much, how many all medieval Europe.

Alex Fantalov

 

Taranis and Cernunnos. (A. Fantalov, watercolour).

 

Images of Celtic deities.

 

 

Thracian, Dacian, Illyrian, Scythian and Alanian mythologies:

 

Limitation of Thraco-Dacian and Illyrian mythological sources, in comparison with Celtic and Germanic-Scandinavian ones has got the certain problems. So, for example, is not clear, whether they were esteemed within the framework of the given cultures gods of the Thunder and the Clear Sky though separate hints on their cult are present. It is impossible to identify with full confidence and the God of Earth Powers (it is possible, it Zalmoxis). About Bendis - the Great Goddess we also have very small volume of the information. Actually, all of them were eclipsed by the Cultural Hero in characteristic embodiment of the horseman. It is possible to count the reason of this phenomenon very early development of rather centralised imperial authority in Thraco-Dacian and Illirian traditions. Influence of an image of the Cultural Hero on mass consciousness was so great, that he in later epoch determined character of relation with the advanced religions (that was shown in features of recognition of Mithraism by the Illyrians and Christianities by Thraco-Dacians).

The representatives of Scythian (and Sarmatian) cultural world to the basic types of a structural nucleus corresponded: to the God of Clear Sky - it is possible, Papay or "Ares" (the Scythians), to the God of Thunder - Wacilla (the Alanians); to the God of Earth Powers - Don-Bettyr, Falvara, Afsati; to the Cultural Hero - Kolaksay (the Scythians), Wasgergi (the Alanians); to the Great Goddess - Api and Tabiti (the Scythians), Bzenon, Dzerassa (the Alanians). The attention is given in the absence in the Scythian pantheon of the God of Thunder and the God of Earth Powers and accent for an image of the Cultural Hero (whether it be images of Kolaksay in anthropomorphic art or a deer pays to itself within the framework of animal style). Last fact with the big share of confidence can be attributed on the account of early addition of imperial authority at Scythians (as it was mentioned above, their history shares for the appropriate periods - 'the first empire', 'the second empire', 'the third empire'). Representatives of the Sarmatic-Alanian branch esteemed also the various deities which are going back to the God of Earth Powers. In it, probably, their ideological difference from the Scythians consists.

Fantalov Alex

CULTURE of BARBAROUS EUROPE:

TYPOLOGY of MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGES

 

Chapter 1. Barbarous Europe and typology problem of mythological characters.

1.1. Barbarous Europe, and it cultural worlds

Concept of "Barbarous Europe ".

The Term "barbarians" - "bearded", having the Greek origin, has undergone the certain evolution in scientific and ordinary consciousness. Greeks of classical epoch named so all other peoples. Such opposition of "we" - "outsiders" is present in any cultures. Hence, Greeks included in concept "barbarians" and representatives advanced ancient oriental civilisations: Egyptians, Babylonians, Lydians, and Phoenicians. From the point of view of ancient Greek thinkers, for example, Aristotle, such division existed and will exist always.

The Romans, former pupils and successors of Greeks apprehended this terminology. But they bring about an extensive coloniser politics, first of all in Europe (Iberia, Gallia, Illyria, Thrace, Britain), involving in an orbit of the activity and a way of life independent peoples. Those, accepting the Roman order, "Pax Romana", as though ceased be "barbarians", becoming, on modern expression by "civilised people", (as, for example, Gallo-Romans). Hence, "barbarians", from the point of view of Rome are peoples and tribes of Europe, yet not had time to perceive an antiques culture (or it is active opposed to this). Thus, the Romans perceived " Barbarous Europe " - "Barbaricum" as a certain ethnic-cultural integrity. This opposition was promoted also by that the Roman world and Barbaricum belonged to various types of culture: The first - to type of culture of the antique policy, the second - to type of culture of cattlemen - nomads (Kagan, 2000, v.1, 162-165). Though traditionally nomads name Turkish-Mongolian peoples of the Central Asia, it is necessary to recognise, that the expanded understanding of the term including numerous vagrant peoples allows see the nomadic world as the global history-cultural phenomenon. Peoples of Barbarous Europe can be considered as a part of this world, showing characteristic for it three dominants: " cattle breeding, a nomadic way of life and aggression " (Kagan, 2000, v.1, 182). Even in 12 century in the Irish and Scottish kingdoms the cattle played a role of the basic riches.

The Roman understanding in any measure has inherited and arisen in bowels of empire Christianity. But when it became prevailing, confession of the Christian doctrine was included in number of necessary attributes of a belonging to a civilisation also. The follower of new belief began to refer to as a proud name "Roman", opposing itself "Paganus" - to the pagan as whom it could be understood both the native of empire and the foreigner. Later the countryman was named Paganus (and not casually - in a countryside pagan rites longly kept).

Then, half christianisiried and romanisiried German have destroyed decayed Rome and have based the medieval world. But elements of the Roman ideology were kept. To tell the truth, new, feudal way is not deduced neither from antique society, nor from the Christian community, and represents generation of a "barbarous" society (for example, feudal tournament performance, probably, occurs from love of barbarians to tinsel and vanity). To some extent, it is a way for the tribe of the conquerors, which have replaced besides a habitant landscape to dominate over conquested Roman population. On the other hand, the European feudalism has, probably, and deeper roots about what speak feature of the organisation Celt to a generality supervising the Western Europe in pre-Roman times.

Despite of the introduced innovations, representation about universal empire as about the certain ideal it was kept. From here and Charles Great's crowning, and " Sacred Roman empire of the German nation ", and even an imperial title of Napoleon. The western Europeans began to name "Barbarians" peoples which were not recognising religious authority Roman pontifics and political (let even fictitious) domination of new emperors. Mainly peoples of the East Europe fell under this concept.

After 16 century, in connection with secularisation of the Western Europe, last, having lost the name " the Christian world ", to epoch of Education began to be called as the world "civilised". Gradually the belonging to the Christian religion (not only in its western variant, but also as a whole) has ceased to play a role of the indicator for entry in this cultural - historical generality. Crucial importance, as well as in the Roman epoch, has received opposition of "barbarity" and "civilisation". From the similar point of view, mastering by such exotic country as Japan of some political, technological, legal standards has attached it to the Western, "civilised" world.

In scientific area the Roman understanding of "barbarians", as peoples of the ancient Europe which has been not covered with an antique civilisation was fixed. But there is also a parallel tendency to treat the term as any stage of development. For example, Marks, speaking about the periods of "barbarity" previous to the state development and "wildness followed for Morgan. This approach has except for lacks and the certain advantages. You see Greeks have realised the delimitation with next peoples since the certain period. As writes N. Nikulina "... Division into Greeks and non-Greeks " barbarians " has arisen, in essence, only in the classical period of the Greek history, after well-known Greek-Persian wars in which Greeks have gained a brilliant victory " (N. Nikulina, 1994, p. 20). And if we shall glance deep into their histories we shall see, that ancestors of Spartans have come to Balkan Peninsula in 12-th. c. BD From the Central Europe where lived side by side with ancestors the Celts, Illyrians, Germans, Balts and other, nothing being allocated among them. And others pre-Greek tribes were from different places of Europe where in any way did not surpass in the civilised to a level its other peoples. Means, they were then barbarians, similarly to the neighbours. We shall not approve "barbarians" environmental peoples began then when Greeks have counted as their those. And the transition to "civilisation" occured gradually. Macedonians, for example, were slighted as "barbarians" even after Peloponess war. Even later "civilised people" have realised itself the Romans and Italics as a whole.

The stage conception of "barbarity" has important value for the present research. It is the most probable that mythopoethic the tradition is a product of oral creativity of peoples which are taking place at a heroic, "barbarous" step of development. Indian rishas, Celtic bards Scandinavian skalds and even Greek aedas sang of gods and brave leaders with such force of images because their hearts were young. On words Levi-Strauss, in "... Those last times creators were such format what now seems outside achievable ".

And ingenious Italian J. Viko, developed in 18 century (on a material of Europe and Near East) wrote the cyclic concept of a history about two circulations of development. The first covered the Ancient world. The beginning of it is lost in depth of centuries when king-priests ruled. Over their era was triumphed with "religious times". Then there has come homeric epoch which Viko has named "heroic" from time to time. They were topped with Roman empire with the monarchic principle ratified in it. Each time, on Viko, was characterised by the type of legal norms: "The divine law", "the heroic law", "the human law". The new cycle of a history began from " the second barbarity " (we speak - the period of Great resettlement of peoples). Then " the divine right " (we shall recollect " the divine court " in legal practice) again was established. Divine times were replaced from time to time heroic (aristocratic) with their feudal wars and crusades. And, at last, in New Time there has come epoch of civil times. From the theory of the Italian thinker follows, by the way, that " human times " for outcome and we stand on a threshold of "the third barbarity".

 

Ethnic-cultural and chronological limits of a material:

It Is necessary to note, that Barbarous Europe as cultural - historical unity, it was formed almost exclusively " Indo-European by Europeans ". Peoples which are taking place outside Indo-European language family (Iberians, Picts etc.) turned in relicts to time of the beginning of the period interesting us, have left rather limited pagan heritage.

The language criterion is put in terms of the allocation of this or that mythological tradition standard in a science. It is connected to names of German scientists A. Kun, W. Manhard, English M. Muller, Russian F. Buslajev, I. Afanasjev and others, basing on achievements of comparative-historical linguistics and aimed at reconstruction Indo-European mythologies as initial system of mythological representations of ancestors of modern peoples of this language family. "We consider Indo-European mythology as set Hittite (and others Anatolean mythologies - Luwian, Pali and later - Lydian, Lycian), Aryan (including the Indian mythology, the Iranian mythology, Dard and Nuristan (Cafir), middle East, aryan mythologies), the Armenian mythology, the Greek mythology, Italic mythologies, Celt mythologies, the German-Scandinavian mythology, the Baltic mythology, Slavic mythology, Tocharic mythologies, and also fragments of mythologies concerning to Albanian, Thracian, Illyrian, Phrygian, Venetian and to some other traditions known in incomplete transfer " (Myths of nations of the world, 1998, ò. 1, 527).

The Second criterion for allocation of this or that tradition are this to archaeology. An origin Indo-European frequently connect to archaeological culture of fighting axes. This culture reached in the beginning 3 thousand BD From Jutland up to Volga. To speak about any representatives nowadays existing language groups, in view of full absence of written certificates it is not necessary. In the period with late bronze up to early Iron Age (14 - 7-th. c. BD) the significant part of the Western and Central Europe was occupied with so-called culture of fields of burials. In parallel there were cultures in Scandinavia and the East Europe. It is probable, then already there was a process of formation of European peoples known to us. Nevertheless, a gloom around of their history clears away later (Laten period - with 5 c. BD) when they get in sight the Greek authors.

With reference to this time, using in aggregate linguistic and archaeological criteria, experts allocate large cultural a generality. For example, in Europe on the limit of 1-th c. BD M. B. Shchukin totals such 7 unites, having named them " the cultural worlds ". " All these worlds are not monoethnical and not monocultural, and represent conglomerates of various archaeological cultures, various tribes and peoples (that cultures and ethnoses not necessarily coincide with each other). But making each world have and the certain similarity caused by a number of the reasons - similar forms of economic activities, the social organisation, an environment, and also following from here and similarity of structure of the majority of cultures of everyone of " the world ", and, probably, in any measure and a mental warehouse of overwhelming part of the population that is most adequately reflected in art, but also in the general shape of culture." (Shchukin, 1994, with. 12 - 13). Conditionally Shchukin calls these worlds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, but recognises, that in fact these were the Greeks and Italics, the Celts , the Germanics , the Balts , the Finno-Ugrics, the Scythian-Sarmatians, the Thracian-Dacians , though considers, that in this worlds could enter and peoples of other language groups. "The cultural world" the present research and as a whole will adhere to this definition of concept. However the classical antiquity is behind frameworks of Barbarous Europe. It represented, faster, other pole of existence forming together with " a pole of barbarians " more extensive system. These both poles were in close interaction. Do not enter into a circle of Barbarous Europe and the Finno-Ugrics which are not Indo-European and practically did not contact to a classical antiquity and had special historical destiny. On the other hand, as in the present research wider time interval is mentioned, rather than in work Shchukin, to number of the cultural worlds of considered region it is necessary to attribute also the Slavs (which are not taken into account). Shchukin believes, that they were not generated yet by 1 century AD) and the Illyrians (the last from Shchukin's point of view already have left to a limit millennium from a historical stage). So, we have seven cultural worlds of Barbarous Europe: Celt, Germanic-Scandinavian, Baltic, Scythian-Sarmatian, Thracian-Dacian, Illyrian, Slavic ones. Except for them and a classical antiquity this research repeatedly addresses to some other related Indo-European to the cultural worlds: Etruscan, Hittite-Luwian, Iranian and Indian, giving the important additional information.

Chronologically the material is marked as follows. In mass volume, the works of art, able to comprise mythological images and the plots correlated with references, start to appear in Barbarous Europe from the beginning of the Iron Age (so-called Halstadt With - 7 in. AD, and it is especial from the following behind it Laten the period - with 5-th. c. BD). To this time have arisen the Celts and the Slavs , Thracian-Dacian and Illyrian the cultural worlds (be relative so early origin of Germanic-Scandinavians, Balts and Slavs are not present such confidence). And, that it is important, in the same period cultural has stood apart, having opposed itself to "barbarians" antique Greece, (the fact having far-reaching consequences).

The top limit of existence of Barbarous Europe is more dim. In territory of Roman Empire by which were won Celt and the Thracian-Dacians the worlds, the Christianity was ratified in 4-th AD, superseding pagan cults. In parallel there was slower process of christening of the German, finished to 10-th AD the Scythian-Sarmatians became victims of epoch of Great resettlement of peoples though their relict - Alanians, has escaped in mountains of Caucasus and has created rich epic the tradition richly sated with mythological motives.

Pagan mythology Slavs and Scandinavians Longer kept. At the last it even has gone through original blossoming in 5 - 11-th. c. AD That were "overdue flowers northern paganism" Nevertheless, by 12 century christening of Slavs and Scandinavians basically was completed. Last bastion - Lithuanian paganism has fallen in the beginning of 15 centuries.

All told concerns to pagan cults as to prevailing system of outlook. But at a level of folklore and a folk art vestiges of mythology were strongly kept up to 19 - the beginnings of 20 centuries. They also are the important materials for the researcher.

The Basic cultural worlds of Barbarous Europe had in many respects the common destiny. They have taken place from uniform Indo-European a root, during centuries keeping similarity in pagan cults and mythologies. Thus an enormous role in their evolutions the Greek-Roman influence (mentioned, in particular, iconography and writing) has played. Characteristic absence at peoples, taking place on heroic - a "barbarous" stage of development of graphic tradition, apparently, is. We can observe a similar collision on various examples. D.S. Raevsky writes: " In pre-Scythian epoch in Northern Black Sea coast in an equal measure are not known neither images of the person, nor the image of animals <...> We Compare these data to that fact, that in a history Indo-Aryans, promoted on territory Hindustan Peninsula, also existed the long period when they, probably, did not know the fine arts <...> Have not brought with itself the fine arts and the Iranians, settled on a boundary 2 - 1 millenniums AD On the Iranian plateau: in a basis of the graphic tradition existing here later, has lain, on V.G. Lukonina's expression, " style of citations ", ò. å. She(it) was generated on the basis of borrowing images and iconographic circuits from an arsenal of art of Near East of previous time. " (Raevsky, 1985, 89 - 90). The Germans borrowed graphic receptions at the Romans, Celts borrowed them at the Etruscans, and those, in turn - at Greeks. Certainly, the heroic stage frequently is characterised by a high level of spiritual culture and barbarians, using another's iconographic circuits, put in them the original maintenance. However the temptation of the next advanced civilisation always very strongly influences barbarians. Any of peoples of Barbarous Europe could not from the beginning and up to the end to pass the original way of development, being cultural is absorbed antique, or in later time Christian by the worlds. Any of these peoples has not generated the steady centralised power within the framework of the primary tradition. The Celts, Thracian-Dacians and Scythian-Sarmatians became victims of a gain. German and Slavic peoples built the statehood on the basis of the Christian-Roman heritage. Nevertheless, features Indo-European traditions appeared are deeply implanted in the European cultures, rendering powerful influence on all subsequent history of these parts of the world. In feudal epoch they became important making simultaneously national and aristocratic outlooks, and in 19 century - during formation of the national states of Europe were claimed by the new intelligence searching for ways of self-identification.

So, summarising told, it is possible to tell, that the concept of "barbarity" of this research has incorporated:

1. cultural historical ("Roman") understanding;

2. religious ("medieval") understanding;

3. stage understanding.

Cultural - historical concept " Barbarous Europe " is because it was occupied by peoples having general Indo-European the origin and on which, besides, a strong print influence of a powerful Greek-Roman civilization has lain. Religious concept it is owing to domination in its territory of the pagan religions also having a uniform origin. At last, it is possible to consider Barbarous Europe and with stage points of view as its existence passed within the limits of the delayed heroic century which overcoming for this or that people meant, simultaneously, and an output from uniform "barbarous" cultural space. The territory of this space, certainly, varied for so long period of a history. In different time it occupied space of modern Spain, France, British Isles, Germany, Scandinavia, Central and the East Europe (up to Volga).

Our days, it is possible to divide Barbarous Europe, as well as Europe into two big regions conditionally. The first covers its west, the second - the centre and the east. The tradition of similar differentiation takes the beginning in the Greek sources speaking about "Celts" and "Scythians" (using these concepts it is wider, than we). The West-European barbarians is the Celts and German, " barbarians in the pure state ", taking place in close interaction with each other. Besides peoples Celt and the German-Scandinavian groups occupy unique position among other European barbarians on volume of the mythological heritage. And it in an equal measure concerns both the fine arts, and literary monuments. The analogy between the Celts and German-Scandinavians in this question is rather remarkable. Continental the Celts (basically Gauls) have created huge quantity of images of the gods, but have not left mythological texts. But island tradition (mainly Irish, but also and British) have kept great mythoephic the tradition comparable on volume with antique. German peoples (to be exact, their Scandinavian branch) posess the significant file of the pagan fine arts concentrating on continent - in Sweden, to Denmark, Norway. But the mythology was besides kept on island - in Iceland. Thus, the West-European barbarians are favourably allocated in comparison with the east neighbours who are almost not having in writing fixed myths.

However, at significant similarity of situations in the field of preservation Celt and the Scandinavian mythologies, a parity iconography and a textual material in both traditions unequally. The Irish sagas have undergone to powerful processing from positions of the Christian doctrine. Therefore, in business of reconstruction Celt pantheon monuments of pagan, continental art have paramount value. On the contrary, the Scandinavian written sources were kept in rather complete kind and allow to be guided by them at the analysis of artefacts (and chronological break between them is not so great).

The Celts and German long time were the basic contenders of a classical antiquity, and have made skeleton of feudal Europe later. Their many primary features have determined process of a medieval society.

Central and the East Europe more mosaic region. Its territory can be divided into three smaller sizes of area by cultural - historical and language criteria. The first was occupied the Thracians and Illyrians, the second Scythians and Sarmatians, the third Balts and Slavs. Many philologists - Indo-European as it was already marked, carry these peoples to east branch of this language family allocated some more of A. Meje. A.N. Savchenko includes in it Indo-Iranians, Greeks, Armenians, Phrigians, Thracians, Balts and Slavs - the truth, without Illyrians (Savchenko, 1974, p. 374 - 375). On this question there is no full clearness. However, for mentioned peoples of East and Central Europe the common tendencies of social-cultural development that was reflected and in mythological representations are characteristic. It is typical, that Thracians, Illyrians, Scythians, Sarmatians, Balts practically have not kept the texts containing a coherent statement of legends about gods and attitudes between them. Instead of it we have late folklore and brief annalistic data. But the leading role in reconstruction of mythology of region is played with the fine arts. Studying of this material allows to draw a conclusion, that characteristic feature pagan (and appreciably and post pagan) ideologies central and East-European peoples, at all variants, is reverence in quality of very important religious object of the horseman on a white horse, "king of past and future", messiah.

 

1.2. A structural nucleus in mythologies of peoples of Barbarous Europe and social-cultural determinants of the basic mythological types.

Menu

 

 For consultations or tutoring: history, political science, cultural science, art criticism, painting and theories of composition; purchase of pictures and also installing of advertising - E-mail: fantalov@hotmail.com

 CULTURE of BARBAROUS EUROPE:

TYPOLOGY of MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGES

 

Chapter 1. Barbarous Europe and typology problem of mythological characters.

1.1. Barbarous Europe, and it cultural worlds

Concept of "Barbarous Europe ".

The Term "barbarians" - "bearded", having the Greek origin, has undergone the certain evolution in scientific and ordinary consciousness. Greeks of classical epoch named so all other peoples. Such opposition of "we" - "outsiders" is present in any cultures. Hence, Greeks included in concept "barbarians" and representatives advanced ancient oriental civilisations: Egyptians, Babylonians, Lydians, and Phoenicians. From the point of view of ancient Greek thinkers, for example, Aristotle, such division existed and will exist always.

The Romans, former pupils and successors of Greeks apprehended this terminology. But they bring about an extensive coloniser politics, first of all in Europe (Iberia, Gallia, Illyria, Thrace, Britain), involving in an orbit of the activity and a way of life independent peoples. Those, accepting the Roman order, "Pax Romana", as though ceased be "barbarians", becoming, on modern expression by "civilised people", (as, for example, Gallo-Romans). Hence, "barbarians", from the point of view of Rome are peoples and tribes of Europe, yet not had time to perceive an antiques culture (or it is active opposed to this). Thus, the Romans perceived " Barbarous Europe " - "Barbaricum" as a certain ethnic-cultural integrity. This opposition was promoted also by that the Roman world and Barbaricum belonged to various types of culture: The first - to type of culture of the antique policy, the second - to type of culture of cattlemen - nomads (Kagan, 2000, v.1, 162-165). Though traditionally nomads name Turkish-Mongolian peoples of the Central Asia, it is necessary to recognise, that the expanded understanding of the term including numerous vagrant peoples allows see the nomadic world as the global history-cultural phenomenon. Peoples of Barbarous Europe can be considered as a part of this world, showing characteristic for it three dominants: " cattle breeding, a nomadic way of life and aggression " (Kagan, 2000, v.1, 182). Even in 12 century in the Irish and Scottish kingdoms the cattle played a role of the basic riches.

The Roman understanding in any measure has inherited and arisen in bowels of empire Christianity. But when it became prevailing, confession of the Christian doctrine was included in number of necessary attributes of a belonging to a civilisation also. The follower of new belief began to refer to as a proud name "Roman", opposing itself "Paganus" - to the pagan as whom it could be understood both the native of empire and the foreigner. Later the countryman was named Paganus (and not casually - in a countryside pagan rites longly kept).

Then, half christianisiried and romanisiried German have destroyed decayed Rome and have based the medieval world. But elements of the Roman ideology were kept. To tell the truth, new, feudal way is not deduced neither from antique society, nor from the Christian community, and represents generation of a "barbarous" society (for example, feudal tournament performance, probably, occurs from love of barbarians to tinsel and vanity). To some extent, it is a way for the tribe of the conquerors, which have replaced besides a habitant landscape to dominate over conquested Roman population. On the other hand, the European feudalism has, probably, and deeper roots about what speak feature of the organisation Celt to a generality supervising the Western Europe in pre-Roman times.

Despite of the introduced innovations, representation about universal empire as about the certain ideal it was kept. From here and Charles Great's crowning, and " Sacred Roman empire of the German nation ", and even an imperial title of Napoleon. The western Europeans began to name "Barbarians" peoples which were not recognising religious authority Roman pontifics and political (let even fictitious) domination of new emperors. Mainly peoples of the East Europe fell under this concept.

After 16 century, in connection with secularisation of the Western Europe, last, having lost the name " the Christian world ", to epoch of Education began to be called as the world "civilised". Gradually the belonging to the Christian religion (not only in its western variant, but also as a whole) has ceased to play a role of the indicator for entry in this cultural - historical generality. Crucial importance, as well as in the Roman epoch, has received opposition of "barbarity" and "civilisation". From the similar point of view, mastering by such exotic country as Japan of some political, technological, legal standards has attached it to the Western, "civilised" world.

In scientific area the Roman understanding of "barbarians", as peoples of the ancient Europe which has been not covered with an antique civilisation was fixed. But there is also a parallel tendency to treat the term as any stage of development. For example, Marks, speaking about the periods of "barbarity" previous to the state development and "wildness followed for Morgan. This approach has except for lacks and the certain advantages. You see Greeks have realised the delimitation with next peoples since the certain period. As writes N. Nikulina "... Division into Greeks and non-Greeks " barbarians " has arisen, in essence, only in the classical period of the Greek history, after well-known Greek-Persian wars in which Greeks have gained a brilliant victory " (N. Nikulina, 1994, p. 20). And if we shall glance deep into their histories we shall see, that ancestors of Spartans have come to Balkan Peninsula in 12-th. c. BD From the Central Europe where lived side by side with ancestors the Celts, Illyrians, Germans, Balts and other, nothing being allocated among them. And others pre-Greek tribes were from different places of Europe where in any way did not surpass in the civilised to a level its other peoples. Means, they were then barbarians, similarly to the neighbours. We shall not approve "barbarians" environmental peoples began then when Greeks have counted as their those. And the transition to "civilisation" occured gradually. Macedonians, for example, were slighted as "barbarians" even after Peloponess war. Even later "civilised people" have realised itself the Romans and Italics as a whole.

The stage conception of "barbarity" has important value for the present research. It is the most probable that mythopoethic the tradition is a product of oral creativity of peoples which are taking place at a heroic, "barbarous" step of development. Indian rishas, Celtic bards Scandinavian skalds and even Greek aedas sang of gods and brave leaders with such force of images because their hearts were young. On words Levi-Strauss, in "... Those last times creators were such format what now seems outside achievable ".

And ingenious Italian J. Viko, developed in 18 century (on a material of Europe and Near East) wrote the cyclic concept of a history about two circulations of development. The first covered the Ancient world. The beginning of it is lost in depth of centuries when king-priests ruled. Over their era was triumphed with "religious times". Then there has come homeric epoch which Viko has named "heroic" from time to time. They were topped with Roman empire with the monarchic principle ratified in it. Each time, on Viko, was characterised by the type of legal norms: "The divine law", "the heroic law", "the human law". The new cycle of a history began from " the second barbarity " (we speak - the period of Great resettlement of peoples). Then " the divine right " (we shall recollect " the divine court " in legal practice) again was established. Divine times were replaced from time to time heroic (aristocratic) with their feudal wars and crusades. And, at last, in New Time there has come epoch of civil times. From the theory of the Italian thinker follows, by the way, that " human times " for outcome and we stand on a threshold of "the third barbarity".

 

Ethnic-cultural and chronological limits of a material:

It Is necessary to note, that Barbarous Europe as cultural - historical unity, it was formed almost exclusively " Indo-European by Europeans ". Peoples which are taking place outside Indo-European language family (Iberians, Picts etc.) turned in relicts to time of the beginning of the period interesting us, have left rather limited pagan heritage.

The language criterion is put in terms of the allocation of this or that mythological tradition standard in a science. It is connected to names of German scientists A. Kun, W. Manhard, English M. Muller, Russian F. Buslajev, I. Afanasjev and others, basing on achievements of comparative-historical linguistics and aimed at reconstruction Indo-European mythologies as initial system of mythological representations of ancestors of modern peoples of this language family. "We consider Indo-European mythology as set Hittite (and others Anatolean mythologies - Luwian, Pali and later - Lydian, Lycian), Aryan (including the Indian mythology, the Iranian mythology, Dard and Nuristan (Cafir), middle East, aryan mythologies), the Armenian mythology, the Greek mythology, Italic mythologies, Celt mythologies, the German-Scandinavian mythology, the Baltic mythology, Slavic mythology, Tocharic mythologies, and also fragments of mythologies concerning to Albanian, Thracian, Illyrian, Phrygian, Venetian and to some other traditions known in incomplete transfer " (Myths of nations of the world, 1998, ò. 1, 527).

The Second criterion for allocation of this or that tradition are this to archaeology. An origin Indo-European frequently connect to archaeological culture of fighting axes. This culture reached in the beginning 3 thousand BD From Jutland up to Volga. To speak about any representatives nowadays existing language groups, in view of full absence of written certificates it is not necessary. In the period with late bronze up to early Iron Age (14 - 7-th. c. BD) the significant part of the Western and Central Europe was occupied with so-called culture of fields of burials. In parallel there were cultures in Scandinavia and the East Europe. It is probable, then already there was a process of formation of European peoples known to us. Nevertheless, a gloom around of their history clears away later (Laten period - with 5 c. BD) when they get in sight the Greek authors.

With reference to this time, using in aggregate linguistic and archaeological criteria, experts allocate large cultural a generality. For example, in Europe on the limit of 1-th c. BD M. B. Shchukin totals such 7 unites, having named them " the cultural worlds ". " All these worlds are not monoethnical and not monocultural, and represent conglomerates of various archaeological cultures, various tribes and peoples (that cultures and ethnoses not necessarily coincide with each other). But making each world have and the certain similarity caused by a number of the reasons - similar forms of economic activities, the social organisation, an environment, and also following from here and similarity of structure of the majority of cultures of everyone of " the world ", and, probably, in any measure and a mental warehouse of overwhelming part of the population that is most adequately reflected in art, but also in the general shape of culture." (Shchukin, 1994, with. 12 - 13). Conditionally Shchukin calls these worlds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, but recognises, that in fact these were the Greeks and Italics, the Celts , the Germanics , the Balts , the Finno-Ugrics, the Scythian-Sarmatians, the Thracian-Dacians , though considers, that in this worlds could enter and peoples of other language groups. "The cultural world" the present research and as a whole will adhere to this definition of concept. However the classical antiquity is behind frameworks of Barbarous Europe. It represented, faster, other pole of existence forming together with " a pole of barbarians " more extensive system. These both poles were in close interaction. Do not enter into a circle of Barbarous Europe and the Finno-Ugrics which are not Indo-European and practically did not contact to a classical antiquity and had special historical destiny. On the other hand, as in the present research wider time interval is mentioned, rather than in work Shchukin, to number of the cultural worlds of considered region it is necessary to attribute also the Slavs (which are not taken into account). Shchukin believes, that they were not generated yet by 1 century AD) and the Illyrians (the last from Shchukin's point of view already have left to a limit millennium from a historical stage). So, we have seven cultural worlds of Barbarous Europe: Celt, Germanic-Scandinavian, Baltic, Scythian-Sarmatian, Thracian-Dacian, Illyrian, Slavic ones. Except for them and a classical antiquity this research repeatedly addresses to some other related Indo-European to the cultural worlds: Etruscan, Hittite-Luwian, Iranian and Indian, giving the important additional information.

Chronologically the material is marked as follows. In mass volume, the works of art, able to comprise mythological images and the plots correlated with references, start to appear in Barbarous Europe from the beginning of the Iron Age (so-called Halstadt With - 7 in. AD, and it is especial from the following behind it Laten the period - with 5-th. c. BD). To this time have arisen the Celts and the Slavs , Thracian-Dacian and Illyrian the cultural worlds (be relative so early origin of Germanic-Scandinavians, Balts and Slavs are not present such confidence). And, that it is important, in the same period cultural has stood apart, having opposed itself to "barbarians" antique Greece, (the fact having far-reaching consequences).

The top limit of existence of Barbarous Europe is more dim. In territory of Roman Empire by which were won Celt and the Thracian-Dacians the worlds, the Christianity was ratified in 4-th AD, superseding pagan cults. In parallel there was slower process of christening of the German, finished to 10-th AD the Scythian-Sarmatians became victims of epoch of Great resettlement of peoples though their relict - Alanians, has escaped in mountains of Caucasus and has created rich epic the tradition richly sated with mythological motives.

Pagan mythology Slavs and Scandinavians Longer kept. At the last it even has gone through original blossoming in 5 - 11-th. c. AD That were "overdue flowers northern paganism" Nevertheless, by 12 century christening of Slavs and Scandinavians basically was completed. Last bastion - Lithuanian paganism has fallen in the beginning of 15 centuries.

All told concerns to pagan cults as to prevailing system of outlook. But at a level of folklore and a folk art vestiges of mythology were strongly kept up to 19 - the beginnings of 20 centuries. They also are the important materials for the researcher.

The Basic cultural worlds of Barbarous Europe had in many respects the common destiny. They have taken place from uniform Indo-European a root, during centuries keeping similarity in pagan cults and mythologies. Thus an enormous role in their evolutions the Greek-Roman influence (mentioned, in particular, iconography and writing) has played. Characteristic absence at peoples, taking place on heroic - a "barbarous" stage of development of graphic tradition, apparently, is. We can observe a similar collision on various examples. D.S. Raevsky writes: " In pre-Scythian epoch in Northern Black Sea coast in an equal measure are not known neither images of the person, nor the image of animals <...> We Compare these data to that fact, that in a history Indo-Aryans, promoted on territory Hindustan Peninsula, also existed the long period when they, probably, did not know the fine arts <...> Have not brought with itself the fine arts and the Iranians, settled on a boundary 2 - 1 millenniums AD On the Iranian plateau: in a basis of the graphic tradition existing here later, has lain, on V.G. Lukonina's expression, " style of citations ", ò. å. She(it) was generated on the basis of borrowing images and iconographic circuits from an arsenal of art of Near East of previous time. " (Raevsky, 1985, 89 - 90). The Germans borrowed graphic receptions at the Romans, Celts borrowed them at the Etruscans, and those, in turn - at Greeks. Certainly, the heroic stage frequently is characterised by a high level of spiritual culture and barbarians, using another's iconographic circuits, put in them the original maintenance. However the temptation of the next advanced civilisation always very strongly influences barbarians. Any of peoples of Barbarous Europe could not from the beginning and up to the end to pass the original way of development, being cultural is absorbed antique, or in later time Christian by the worlds. Any of these peoples has not generated the steady centralised power within the framework of the primary tradition. The Celts, Thracian-Dacians and Scythian-Sarmatians became victims of a gain. German and Slavic peoples built the statehood on the basis of the Christian-Roman heritage. Nevertheless, features Indo-European traditions appeared are deeply implanted in the European cultures, rendering powerful influence on all subsequent history of these parts of the world. In feudal epoch they became important making simultaneously national and aristocratic outlooks, and in 19 century - during formation of the national states of Europe were claimed by the new intelligence searching for ways of self-identification.

So, summarising told, it is possible to tell, that the concept of "barbarity" of this research has incorporated:

1. cultural historical ("Roman") understanding;

2. religious ("medieval") understanding;

3. stage understanding.

Cultural - historical concept " Barbarous Europe " is because it was occupied by peoples having general Indo-European the origin and on which, besides, a strong print influence of a powerful Greek-Roman civilization has lain. Religious concept it is owing to domination in its territory of the pagan religions also having a uniform origin. At last, it is possible to consider Barbarous Europe and with stage points of view as its existence passed within the limits of the delayed heroic century which overcoming for this or that people meant, simultaneously, and an output from uniform "barbarous" cultural space. The territory of this space, certainly, varied for so long period of a history. In different time it occupied space of modern Spain, France, British Isles, Germany, Scandinavia, Central and the East Europe (up to Volga).

Our days, it is possible to divide Barbarous Europe, as well as Europe into two big regions conditionally. The first covers its west, the second - the centre and the east. The tradition of similar differentiation takes the beginning in the Greek sources speaking about "Celts" and "Scythians" (using these concepts it is wider, than we). The West-European barbarians is the Celts and German, " barbarians in the pure state ", taking place in close interaction with each other. Besides peoples Celt and the German-Scandinavian groups occupy unique position among other European barbarians on volume of the mythological heritage. And it in an equal measure concerns both the fine arts, and literary monuments. The analogy between the Celts and German-Scandinavians in this question is rather remarkable. Continental the Celts (basically Gauls) have created huge quantity of images of the gods, but have not left mythological texts. But island tradition (mainly Irish, but also and British) have kept great mythoephic the tradition comparable on volume with antique. German peoples (to be exact, their Scandinavian branch) posess the significant file of the pagan fine arts concentrating on continent - in Sweden, to Denmark, Norway. But the mythology was besides kept on island - in Iceland. Thus, the West-European barbarians are favourably allocated in comparison with the east neighbours who are almost not having in writing fixed myths.

However, at significant similarity of situations in the field of preservation Celt and the Scandinavian mythologies, a parity iconography and a textual material in both traditions unequally. The Irish sagas have undergone to powerful processing from positions of the Christian doctrine. Therefore, in business of reconstruction Celt pantheon monuments of pagan, continental art have paramount value. On the contrary, the Scandinavian written sources were kept in rather complete kind and allow to be guided by them at the analysis of artefacts (and chronological break between them is not so great).

The Celts and German long time were the basic contenders of a classical antiquity, and have made skeleton of feudal Europe later. Their many primary features have determined process of a medieval society.

Central and the East Europe more mosaic region. Its territory can be divided into three smaller sizes of area by cultural - historical and language criteria. The first was occupied the Thracians and Illyrians, the second Scythians and Sarmatians, the third Balts and Slavs. Many philologists - Indo-European as it was already marked, carry these peoples to east branch of this language family allocated some more of A. Meje. A.N. Savchenko includes in it Indo-Iranians, Greeks, Armenians, Phrigians, Thracians, Balts and Slavs - the truth, without Illyrians (Savchenko, 1974, p. 374 - 375). On this question there is no full clearness. However, for mentioned peoples of East and Central Europe the common tendencies of social-cultural development that was reflected and in mythological representations are characteristic. It is typical, that Thracians, Illyrians, Scythians, Sarmatians, Balts practically have not kept the texts containing a coherent statement of legends about gods and attitudes between them. Instead of it we have late folklore and brief annalistic data. But the leading role in reconstruction of mythology of region is played with the fine arts. Studying of this material allows to draw a conclusion, that characteristic feature pagan (and appreciably and post pagan) ideologies central and East-European peoples, at all variants, is reverence in quality of very important religious object of the horseman on a white horse, "king of past and future", messiah.

 

1.2. A structural nucleus in mythologies of peoples of Barbarous Europe and social-cultural determinants of the basic mythological types.

Menu

 

 For consultations or tutoring: history, political science, cultural science, art criticism, painting and theories of composition; purchase of pictures and also installing of advertising - E-mail: fantalov@hotmail.com

 

Scytho-Sarmatians.

Scythians and Sarmatians belong to Iranian branch of Indo-European peoples. The Iranian tribes long time kept cultural unity. But in the beginning 1 thousand B.D. Their world was shaken with fiery sermon Zaratustra. Those who have accepted it, having rejected pagan gods, became historical Iranian. Those who have kept old belief, (it were basically nomads), have received a nickname Turanians. Though later many gods were rehabilitated, the unity appeared lost forever.

Time of occurrence actually Scythians - not later than 8-th c. B.D. They have superseded from Black Sea coast Cimmerians and on their traces have undertaken some intrusions into Forward Asia. Scythians have destroyed an empire Urartu, have crushed Phrygia and were defeated only by Midian king Kiaksar. They have penetrated also into the Central Europe and the Volga region also. That was heroic epoch of Scythians, time so-called " the first empire ".

At the end of 6-th c. B.D. Persian king has made the big invasion in Scythian country that was finished by a full failure. After a victory, in the north coast of Black Sea a state of Scythians has appeared - " the second empire ", named time of "mellow autumn". 4-th c. B.D. - the period of board of king Atej was epoch of the best cultural rise. In 339 A. D. Atej was broken Phillip Macedonian's by armies and was lost, and his empire has broken up also.

In 3-th c. B.D. less extensive state of Scythians with the centre in Crimea was appeared - " the third empire ". Its economic was based with export of bread in Greece. This formation strongly suffered from invasions of Sarmatians, and in 3-th c. B.D. it was finally destroyed with Goths. In epoch of Great resettlement of peoples the rests of Scythians were dissolved among set of tribes.

On a way of life Scythians were divided on settled and nomad tribes. The last used the greatest prestige and referred to "imperial". Their rulers were buried in the big barrows, in support of killed animal and magnificent subjects decoratively an applied art.

In times of Herodot to the east from Don Sarmatians lived. According to a legend transferred by Herodot, they have descended from the Amazon who have married Scythian young men. This legend reflects high position of women at Sarmatian society. Despite of obvious relationship of given peoples, Sarmatians always found out hostility in relation to Scythians, and they posses a main role in route of the last.

Sarmatian tribes have created an armour cavalry; capable is successful to resist to a Macedonian phalanx and the Roman legions. With them help, Parthians revived Iran. Gradually, among Sarmatian peoples were allocated Alanians and "have pulled together all close tribes under the patrimonial name" (to 2-th A. D.). Sarmatians began to refer to Alanians. They have finished Scythians and more than once devastated boundary areas of Roman empire and Sasanid's Iran. The Alanians (their federation reached from Danube up to Aral Sea) were in the union with Goths, but at the end of 4-th A. D. Hunns have crushed also those and others. The part Alanian tribes left to the Far West and together with Vandals has created in territory of Iberia, and then Northern Africa the barbarous kingdom that has lost in 6-th A. D. under swords of Byzantian army. Another has become stronger on Northern Caucasus, having constructed set of stone castles. From time to time they fell under authority of mighty neighbours - Hunns, Ugrian, Mongols and so on, but always kept national-cultural unity. In middle 6-th A. D. the Alanians have accepted Christianity from Byzantium and since then traditionally were guided by the orthodox world. In 19-th A. D. Their descendants - Ossets were part of Russia.

Here it is necessary to tell and about last wave Iranian nomads - the Avars who have come from Syr-Darya. Avars have formed the extensive state with the centre in territory of modern Hungary. They were enemies of Byzantium and allies Iran. Their diplomats conducted skilful politics tricks. Among Avars there were remarkable smyths, creating fine works of art (for example, a ring from Strobjen). From the end 7-th A. D. the power Avarians falls because of incessant revolts of Slavs. Finally the power Turanians in heart of Europe was broken by Charles Great. The rests of Avars were part of Hungarians at the end of 9 centuries A.D.

Safety of Scytho-Sarmatian mythology in the interesting image reminds Celt and German-Scandinavian. With reference to Scythians we can speak about the richest fine arts. It has found reflection as in magnificent metal wares: elements horse harnesses, for example, phalars (round metal plates), the weapon, vessels for drink; and in stone anthropomorphic sculptures - " Scythian idols ". The Sarmato-Alanians, to be exact, their descendants Ossets, have created the remarkable epos - so-called " Legends about Narts " in which mythological characters actively appear. The Nart epos the Osset was borrowed by the majority and neighbours and written down in different variants by scientists of 19 centuries.

Alex Fantalov

 The Slavs.

Hypotheses of Slavs birth can be divided into two basic streams, which is allowable to name "Moscow" one and "Petersburg" one. Representatives of the first deduce an origin of Slavs from depths of Bronze Age (similarly to analogous versions of formation Illyrians, Thracians, Balts etc.). A shortcoming of this current is absence of any written mentions of Slavs about the first centuries of our era. The scientists representing the second stream approve that Slavs have arisen in the first centuries of our era on space between Dnestr, Pripyat and the Vistula. Here they were exposed to various cultural influences: the Balts , the Scythian-Sarmatians, the Thracian-Dacians . Under pressure it is ready also other German tribes (especially, Goths), Slavs were involved in Great Migration of peoples. One of them were set to the west and distributed down to Elba, others were directed on the south, having flooded Balkan Peninsula, the third occupied Black Sea Coast and Dnepr grounds.

In 6 century of our era the Central Europe the new shock - intrusion Iranian-language Avars who have come from Syr-Darya (Central Asia). The Avars have lodged in territory of present Hungary, thus, having divided the territory of Slavic peoples. The last thus, has broken up to southern, western and east branches.

The Destiny of them was various. Southern Slavs (ancestors of Bolgars, Serbs, Croatians, Macedonians etc.) have got in sphere of influence of a civilization of the Mediterranean and is faster than others have accepted Christianity. The western Slavs (their present representatives: Chech, Slovaks, Poles) kept pagan tradition longer. It has received special development from inhabitants of a southern coast of Baltic: south Coast of Baltic Sea and territory between Elba and Oder. At last of 10-th.c. A.D. they existed in difficult conditions of reflection of the German empire expansion. In order to survive, the Baltic Slavs have created warrior princedoms with set towns, most known of which were Arkona and Starigard. In these cities where the big influence had priests, the magnificent wooden temples decorated with a religious sculpture were under construction. Almost all this was lost in 12 century, after falling west Slavic princedoms and the conversion of their population in Catholicism.

Other situation has developed in the East Europe. Mastering its vast spaces, Slavs kept most archaic fig. For fulfilment of pagan divine services hills and groves were used. Special sanctuaries as a round platform were under construction also. The surrounded fence in which centre wooden or stone idols were put.

In creation East Slavic states Ruses have played the important role. According to one point of view "Rus" is the army, a team" (Kirpitchnicov, Dubov, Lebedev) means simply". Other opinion identifies Ruses with annalistic Rugians, people of the German origin living on a southern coast of Baltic. A part of them, being rescueed from an impact it is ready, has moved to the East Europe before Slavs, in 2-th. c. A. D. (Ãóìèëåâ). Anyway, to the beginning of 9 centuries there was a huge Slavic-and-Russian state. Its governor was annalistic Dir, carrying title "khagan" (khan). This nomadic title, unusual to European people was accepted Dir to show the equality with the chapter powerful Khazar Empire. In middle of 9 century, however, the state Slav-Ruses has broken up.

At this time Russia has entered complicated and multilateral attitudes with the countries of Scandinavia. The Vikings, appearing in the East Europe, accepted in the numbers of Finns, Astons, Balts and Slavs and have received here the name "Varyags". The problem of a ruling dynasty is connected with an origin ancient Russian, and then and the Moscow grand dukes carrying a name "Rjurik". In a basis of their genealogy about Rjurik, the leader of Varyago-Russes, called because of the sea annalistic data is put in Novgorod certain Gostomisl for calm revolts. Origin Rjurik is not clear -him count the Dane, Rug or even the western Slav. Successor Rjurik - to "Prophetic Oleg" managed to grasp in 882 and Dnepr Russian together with Kiev where he has transferred the capital. So there was a historical Kiev Russia.

The Kiev Russia played a role of a link between Scandinavia, the Western Europe, Byzantium and the Muslim world. In territory of the East Europe there were two great trading ways: Volhov-Dnepr and competing to it Volga region. To tell the truth, value of the last was sharply reduced after route of Khazar Empire (the main contender of Slavs) by the Kiev prince Svjatoslav in 965.

The outlook of the Kiev Russia was influenced with ideology of Scandinavians and peoples of a southern coast of Baltic Sea. However the general direction of the European events induced the Kiev princes to a withdrawal from paganism, and getting stronger connections with Byzantium, no less than then prosperity by last - to official acceptance of orthodoxy. As it was carried out by grand duke Vladimir in 988 year. Process of transition in new belief appeared (as well as everywhere) long, having stretched up to time of the Mongolian invasion. But also after Russia has received the self-name "sacred", heathenism continued to live as folklore and calendar ceremonialism.

Despite of a huge area habitation, Slavs practically have not kept the description of mythological plots. Their territory was arena of numerous wars and invasions. Neither isolated islands, nor unapproachable mountains here were. To tell the truth, "Iceland the Russian epos" named Russian North (Onega, Petchora and coast of the White Sea). But there were kept epic monuments - first of all "Bylinas" (sagas) where is not present a trace of pagan gods (though attempts to see reflection of these in images of "bogatyrs" (heros) are done). The file of Slavic fairy tales is more archaic. However fairy tales, representing products of art literature, initially contained a fair share of fiction (differing from myths which were object of belief). Mentions of pagan gods we find at Christian authors as every possible " lectures against Paganism " and in such bright product, as "The Word about Igor's shelf". An interesting material, as well as at Balt, represent sing folklore and national holidays. Well-known "Veles book " causes doubts in its authenticity.

The Pagan fine arts of ancient Slavs also are poorer Celtic or Scandinavian ones. Jeweller ornaments on which prospective mythological characters are represented, wooden carved subjects (distaffs etc.) were kept, elements of a stone groove of orthodox cathedrals. The idol is interesting well-known stone Zbrutch idol. The western branch of the given group of peoples was in a little bit other position (we shall recollect pagan cities). But crusaders have not spared wooden temples and sculptures of gods. To present time archaeologists find only rough elements of external furniture of the sanctuaries, kept in subsoil waters and stone relief images of gods in walls of the Catholic churches constructed on a place of destroyed temples. All of them only I am vaguely similar to magnificent descriptions western chronics. The collection small covered runic inscriptions of idols from lock Prilvits, if not doubts in them authentic would be rather important.

 

 Alex Fantalov.

 

The Myths:

The Greek mythology.

Menu

Illyrians.

Proto-Illyrians appear on the Balkan with 13 - 12-th c. B. D. They participated in moving barbarous tribes of Europe to this epoch. In period Halstadt Proto-Illyrians occupied extensive territories in the Central and Southern Europe. At the end of 6-th centuries B. D. Formation of Illyria was finished and it has left on historical arena. There is an allocation of aristocracy from which time of domination there were richly decorated tombs. Cultural influence the Celts were weak, except for the Central Europe which those have Illyrians showed respect for such sanctuaries of Greece, as Ther in Thessaly, the oracle in Epirus etc. In 4-th c. B. D. in Dalmatia (present Dubrovnik - Croatia) it was formed Illyrian empire. Thanks to the union with Thrace and Athenes against Macedonian Phillip aggression the Illyria have kept it independence. In 3-th c. B. D. the Illyrians having taken advantage of interstine wars Hellenistic the states and sharp easing of Epirus. Illyrians, who had significant fleet, have occupied the most part of Epirus, however their successes have inspired fear to Rome. The Romans have broken Illyrian armies and occupied the Adriatic coast. The power of Illyria has finished. Full connection of the country to Rome was achieved to 23 B. D.

But the peak of Illyrian glory was ahead. Despite of romanisation, they kept the certain consciousness inside empire. In 3-th A. D., during great civil wars Illyrians have ratified on the Roman throne a series of the emperors who have received the name " Illyrian ones". Their most known representative was Diocletian. At this time in Illyria it was ratified mithraism, the global religion which has missed nowadays of the Iranian origin (the reasons of success of Mithraism, probably, are covered in similarity between it and ancient Illyrian mythologies). The ideology Illyrian emperors appeared in the conflict to belief of Christians and as both those and others represented unique active groups in conditions of perishing empire (German nevertheless external force) struggle was severe. As skeleton of the Roman army was completed from Illyrians, they destroyed in conditions of incessant civil wars and revolutions. The modern Albanians are descendants of the Illyrians.

Position with safety Illyrian mythology is even worse than with Thracian one. Texts are not present, and the fine arts are poor enough (probably, it developed in a tree). However interest is represented with displays mithraism, blossomed in Illyria to the Roman epoch in which, probably, it was reflected and an authocthonic mythological layer.

 

Alex Fantalov

 

The Scytho-Sarmatians history.

Menu

 

 For consultations or tutoring

A. Fantalov.

German-Scandinavians.

German people appear much later the Celts in a history. Actually, this name the Romans have started to use since 1 century b. D. One of the first displays of " the German spirit " steel of act of the Kymbres and the Teuthonics (the truth, they, probably, belonged to peoples, intermediate between the Celts and Germanics). The Teuthonics aspired to establish the control above Celticum, but eventually were exterminated by the Romans. The same fate has comprehended above mentioned Ariovist. Power of Rome grew and in 1-th c. A. D. Tiberius occupied the grounds between Rhine and Elba. The answer became creation of "power" barbarian king Marobod it covered territories of present Poland, Czech and East Germany, number of Marobod's soldiers reached 70 thousandes and revolt of the Heruscian leader, destroyed in Teuthoburg wood three Roman legions. Retaliatory Roman expeditions in common have not reached the purpose. The organized machine of the Roman regular army finally appeared powerless German have proved, that if people has will to struggle, it in a condition to keep independence.

However, the German tribes did not wish to obey and to own kings. Marobod was expelled. On two one century between empire and Free Germany the balance interrupted, certainly, by conflicts was established.

New epoch has come in middle 3-th c. A. D. - so-called Great resettlement of peoples. Rome was in a condition of a political collapse, and among German young aggressive peoples which L. Gumilev counted generation ethnic a push have appeared: Allemanes, Goths and Francs. To two the big future was fated to last. According to the gothic historian of 6 centuries to Jordan, the Goths and Vandals occured from Southern Scandinavia. They have landed in a mouth of Vistula and have gradually promoted up to Black Sea. Then Goths, having used Bospor ships, have plundered Greece and coast of Asia Minor. In 4 century, in territory of the East Europe there was an extensive power Hermanarih. However Goths have not got on with many local ethnoses (behind exception Alanians) and were expelled hunns. They have found a refuge on the grounds of empire, but with that ïîðû represented permanent threat to Rome. Finally, Westgoths have grasped Gallia and Iberia (Spain), and Ostgoths - Illyria and Italy. Other tribes did not lag behind also: Francs, Vandals, Anglo-Saxons, Herules, Friezes...

Participation of ancient German in numerous wars and often change of places has had an effect on social structure. At these tribes it was not kept ancient Indo-Europeans estates of priests and leaders, or most important people carried out religious practices. By virtue of it, and also early Christianisation (which on continent passed not so softly), the German mythology has not reached us in the protogenic kind. But its Scandinavian variant was kept.

The Scandinavian tribes behind exception it is ready have not taken part in Great resettlement of peoples. These years they showed relative peaceful disposition. Ancestors of Swedes have formed strong Sweden power (described still Tacitus). With 5-th A. D. it enters into a strip economic and cultural blossoming - so-called the Vendel period. Cultural communications of the Scandinavians are distributed from British isles up to Average Volga. In art has developed international "Vendel style" in which are traced both Roman and east (Sarmatian) influence. For its creation the Irish tradition had special value. As intermediaries between Scandinavians and the Celts at this time Anglo-Saxons, probably, acted. But the original centre of the new art covering the European continent up to Frank power and Italy was Sweden and its such centres, as Uppsala, Valcgarde, and Vendel.

However, the period of prosperity and relative rest the event which reminded epoch of Resettlement of peoples and has received the name has replaced " movement of Vikings " (the word "Vikings" occurs whether from "vik" - " a bay, having filled ", whether from "vikingr" - " the pirate, the robber "). Victims of their attacks became England, Ireland, France, Northern Germany, Iberian Peninsula, and Southern Italy. It is known significant, though also an ambiguous role of the Vikings in creation of the Kiev Russia.

The Vikings have opened and have occupied Iceland. Its development had key value for preservation of the Scandinavian mythology. Here it is necessary to mean that the culture of Vikings developed already in Christian time, representing some kind of "overdue flowers northern paganism Retraction of Scandinavians in life of continental Europe entailed their christening quite often accompanied with cultural excesses. In Iceland this process occurred rather peacefully (as well as in Ireland), here long time exist pagan belief, and then ancient gods went in the category of poetic metaphors.

From the point of view of safety of mythology of the Scandinavians are similar the mythology of the Celts . On the one hand, it is a grandiose layer of the pagan arts and crafts categorised as several historical periods. Most significant of these periods were: the Period of great resettlement of peoples (3 - 5-th c. A. D.), left well-known bracteats - gold metal plates, the Vendel period (5 - 8-th c. A. D.) from it it is magnificent ornamented with the weapon; Century of vikings (the end 8 - 11-th c. A. D.) when well-known images on stones and monuments wood grooves were created.

On the other hand, it is texts. Scandinavians had Iceland becoming for them same container of the mythology what for the Celts Ireland was. (In general it is noticed, that on islands relic forms, and not only cultures, but also a nature) more often are kept. And again, a positive role the Christianity with its traditional learning here has played. In 13-th c. A. D. in Iceland two remarkable books were created. She is "Elder Edda" and "Younger Edda". The first represents the anonymous collection mythological, ephic and didactic songs. The second, belonging well-known Sturluson and being on a plan the textbook skaldic poetry, as a matter of fact, is the prosaic and structured transposition of the significant case of myths. Thus it is very important, that both "Eddas" include the major creative and echatologic myths. The Grammar adjoins to these monuments (also mentioning ancient gods, though and in eugemeric interpretation) and a number skaldic verses and work by Danish historian Saxon. Time break between a textual and graphic material is not so great as at the Celts, that also facilitates studying mythologies.

Thracian and Dacian history

Menu

Thraco-Dacians.

Occurrence Thraco-Dacians frequently date to 12 - 11-th c. A. D. Then peoples of the north have destroyed Troja and have crushed Hittite empire. Then ancient Mycenae has fallen. But addition of the basic cultural worlds of Europe - Celtic one, Greek one, Italian one and others has taken place later - in epoch 10 - 8-th c. B. D. Probably, to this time it is expedient to attribute and occurrence of Thrace.

To 6-th c. A. D. extensive and rich Thrace had so rich population, that Greeks counted the Thracians the second nations of the world on number (after Hindus). It was divided on set of tribes. At the end of 6 - the beginning 5-th c. A. D. southern and east parts of the country were seized by Persian tsar that has sped up process of cultural - political development. After a leaving of Persians there has arisen Thracian kingship. This state played the important role in life of East Mediterranean, supplying Athenes bread. But in middle 4-th c. A. D. this kingship has fallen under united impact by Macedonian Phillip and Scythian tsar Atej. The country was part of Macedonia.

After disintegration of empire of Alexander southern Thrace became arena of numerous wars. In 279 - 277 here have intruded the Celts and have formed the own state, which has existed till 220 A. D. The Thracian kingship has revived, though and is strongly cut down borders. It was kept till 31 A. D., when it was finally won by Rome (the leader slaves Spartak was the most known Thracians).

The Tribes of Thracian group lived to the north from Danube, referred to Dacians or Getians. Being in a distance from east and Greek centres, they have not left brilliant art. But their military power grew. Getian tsar has managed to create the strong state. One of successors the Great Alexander, has sufferred defeat from Getians and taken prisoner. A bit later, however, Thracian empire was disorganized.

In 60 B. D. Burebista, one of Dacian leaders has organized great power. Having revived people, suffered before from drunkenness, having united various Daco-Getians tribes and having constructed in Dacia set of fortresses - a stronghold of the power, tsar has begun external expansion. On the Roman data his army totaled 200 thousand person.

About 60 A. D. Burebista it was set to the west, having crushed Celt tribes in Central Europe. Thus he has put an end to Celt domination in this region. Then power Dacians was directed to the east where it was taken the important Greek centre. Probably, Dacians have penetrated into area of Dnepr. Burebista was going to interfere with civil war in Rome, but Caesar's fast victory has broken his plans. Already Caesar, in turn, prepared for intrusion into Dacia. On a twist of fate, both these of the figure were killed as a result of plots almost simultaneously - Caesar in 44, and Burebista in 45 A. D. Dacia has broken up. Burebista is interesting also to that has constructed many sanctuaries. They had the square and round form and were open, consisting from numbers of wooden or stone columns. Sanctuaries, probably, symbolised sacred groves.

New association of the country has taken place at the end of 1-th c. A. D. Under rulership by Decebal Dacia conducted active foreign policy, becoming the centre of gravity of the anti-Roman forces. Decebal actually has won war against emperor Domician, but new emperor of Rome Trajan with hundred-thousandth army has broken power Dacians. Struggle was extremely fierce. Decebal was killed, fortresses were destroyed, many Dacians have left to Carpathian mountains. The rests of the population have mixed up with the Roman colonists, and became ancestors of medieval Vlachs and modern the Romanian. Thraco-Dacians languages were superseded with national Latin.

On it the history of the given group of peoples comes to an end. It is necessary to mention also, that in Hellenistic epoch in Asia Minor there was a small Thracian state Vifinija, and in Bospor an empire in Crimea long time of a rule Thracian dynasty.

The Thraco-Dacians have not left mythological texts. Therefore our knowledge on their mythology (besides avaricious mentions of the Greek authors) there is a rich art of Southern Thrace. Basically it is metal elements of arms and horse harnesses, and also various cups and vessels. After the Roman gain in Thrace (as well as in Gallia) the monumental style which has expressed, in particular in a genre of a funeral plate with the syncretic, "Thraco-Roman" image of the horseman blossoms.

 

Alex Fantalov

 Alex Fantalov.

Summary table of Indo-European gods

by natural and social functions.

 

function

Greek mythology

Indian mythology

Scandin. mythology

Slav mythology

Balt mythology

Irish mythology

1

sky

Ouranes

Zeus

Varuna

Dyaus

Tyr

Svarog

Dievas

Nuadha

(Teutat)

2

thunder

Zeus

Parjanya

Indra

Thor

Perun

Perkunas

(Taranis)

3

war

Ares

Skanda

Indra

Tyr

Odin

Perun

Perkunas

Nuadha

Morrighan

4

kingship

Zeus

Indra

Odin

Herovit

Perun

Dievas

Perkunas

Nuadha

Lugh

5

earth

Gaia

Prthivi

Erd

Mokos

Zemes- mate

Danu

Brigit

6

fate

Moirae

 

Nornir

Valkyrie

Mokos

Laima,

Dekla,

Karta

triad of Mother-Goddesses

7

goddess of love

Aphrodite

Laksmi

Freyja

Lada

Laima

Aine

8

matrimon

Hera

Savitri

Frigg

Lada

Laima

 

9

natural power

Dionysus

Rudra

Shiva

Freyr

Herovit

Vels

(Potrimpo)

(Cernunnos-Hes)

Dahghda

10

forest,

animals

Pan

Pusan

Rudra

 

Veles

(Puskaits)

(Cernunnos)

11

underworld

Hades

Yama

Varuna

Odin

Hel

Veles

Vels

(Patollo)

Dahghda

Manannan

12

psychopomp

Hermes

Yama

Odin

 

Sovius

 

13

mystery knowledge

Hermes

Visvakarman

Odin

Veles

Vels

Lugh

Oghma

14

sea

Poseidon

Varuna

Eagor

Njord

 

(Autrimps)

Manannan

15

light and

harmony

Apollo

Mitra

Bhaga

Vishnu

Balder

Dazhbog

 

Mac Ok

(Mapon)

16

fire

Hesta

Agni

Loki?

Svarogich

Gabie

 

17

wind

Boreas

Vayu

Njord

Stribog

Vejapats

 

18

moon

 

Soma

Mani

 

Meness

 

19

sun

Helios

Surya

Sol

Hors

Saule

(Belenus)

20

dawn

Eos

Ussas

 

Usen

Ausrine

(Epona)?

21

twins

Dioscuri

Asvinau

 

 

Sons of Dievas

 

22

god of love

Eros

Kama

 

Lel

 

Mac Ok

23

crafts-manship

Hephaistos

cyclops

Tvastar

dwarfs

Kozma

Demyan

Kalvaitis

Goibhniu

24

medicine

Asclepius

Dhanvantari

 

 

(Aushauts)

Dian-Cecht

 

 

The Basic types of the Indo-European gods.

 

Main menu

For consultations or tutoring: history, political science, cultural science, art criticism, painting and theories of composition; purchase of pictures and also installing of advertising - E-mail: fantalov@hotmail.com

A. Fantalov

"The original Indo-European types of gods

(Materials of Conference dedicated Punin by St. Petersburg State University 2000).

For more detailed argumentation see: “Indo-European mythologies: genesis and evolution of characters.”

 

 

In terms of numerous artifacts findings author suggests to distinguish such original Indo-European mythological types as: 'The God of Thunder ' (Scandinavian Thor, Celt Taranis, Slav Perun, Balt Perkunas, Indian Indra); 'The God of Sky' (Indian Dyaus, Balt Dievas, Scandinavian Tyr); 'The Great Goddess' (Greek Hera, Indian Prithivi, Scandinavian Erd, Slav Mokos, Balt Zemes-mate, Ireland Danu); 'The Divine Twins' (Greek Dioskuri, Indian Asvinau, Balt Sons of Dievas), 'The God of Earth' (Greek Dionysus, Indian Rudra, Scandinavian Freyr, Slav Veles, Balt Vels, Celt Cernunnos) and 'The Cultural Hero' (Greek Hermes and Hercules, Scandinavian Odin, Slav Herovit, Celt Lugh). We can imagine that the male divinities form an original torn ring. These gods are connected with one another like the links of a chain. The characters of the Thunder God and the Sky God can merge (as in Greek mythology - Zeus); the Divine Twins are usually the Sky God’s sons (in Balt mythology - the Sons of Dievas); the Cultural Hero has got functions, similar to ones of the Twins (for instance: he is a physician, an ancestor and protector of people); the Earth God is closely connected with the Cultural Hero as they are season dying and reviving characters. And only the Thunder God and the Earth God fight with each other forming a break in the chain. It is known from Celtic, Baltic, Slav, Indian and many other mythologies.

The female divinity is in the inside of this ring, and she is a mediator between the male gods. The Great Goddess can be a wife of the Thunder God and at the same time a wife of the Earth God (as in Celtic, Slav and Baltic mythologies), or a wife of the Sky God (as in Italian, Greek, Indian traditions. Usually the Great Goddess is the mother of the Twins and the Cultural Hero. And all the later goddesses descended from her character.

We can see the characteristic features of these principal types. The Thunder god was represented as a man standing on a chariot, his weapons are lightning and an axe or a hammer, and his assistant is a wolf. The Sky God is often a war divinity; his weapon is a sword. The Cultural Hero is a rider; his weapon is spear as a rule. Those who believe, that the Thunder God is a rider are mistaken. The God of Earth is a protector of animal and the lord of Otherworld. Lastly, the Great Goddess has got a double nature, the earth one and the sky one.

Alex Fantalov.

A. Fantalov

"Indo-European mythologies: genesis and evolution of characters."

(The materials of international symposium in Pyotr Veliky Anthropology and Ethnography Museum. Saint Petersburg, 1999).

Many scientists study the problems of the Indo-European pantheon reconstruction. This choice is determined by importance of the Indo-European culture sources (especially Scandinavian, Celt, Slav, Balt, Thracian, Indian ones) for the contemporary political and cultural processes. However, as a rule these investigations consider the separate culture worlds in general area of these peoples. Besides that, specialists in texts do not usually consider the objects of the archaic art. But artifacts could be throw light on the many controversial questions. Therefore author of this article believes that he can make the new contribution to the investigations of an archaic kernel of the Indo-European myths and its development tendencies. I have studied the numerous archaeological catalogues and gathered all of the figurative ancient art representations. I have investigated also the modern scientific points of view on the problems of Indo-European pantheon reconstruction. On whole the books by such world scholars as G. Dumezil, V. Ivanov, V. Toporov and others, who study a wide range of the peoples, are known for me. But my leading idea for analysis of the representations is influenced by A. Golan and J. Hatt' studies. Besides the main approach of my work is the comparative one, that has produced the good results in linguistics. And certainly I must study the investigations by specialists in each specific cultural world: Etruscan, Celt, Scandinavian, Thracian, Illirian, Slav, Balt etc.

Golan says about two initial mythological characters: The Goddess of Sky and her husband - The Lord of Underworld. The latter one had two images: undeground - in the form of a snake or a beast, and heavenly - in the form of an eagle (when he flew up to his wife). Golan also thinks that The God of Earth (personified by bull) existed separately from The Lord of Underworld. Besides God of Earth there was the Cultural Hero (in form of ram or stag). He was venerated as an ancestor and protector of people. This hypothesis was confirmed by Golan in terms of numerous examples. But he proves the existence of some general religion in the Neolithic Age. On the contrary, the theme of my research is the Indo-European mythologies. Therefore I am not interested in signs and symbols, but in object of figurative art, such as the claudron from Gundestrup.

Hatt bases his interpretation of this object representations on the idea of the Celtic god of thunder - Taranis (figure 1) and the Celtic god of earth - Cernunnos (figure 2). The Great Goddess was their wife (figure 3). The third male divinity of the Celtic pantheon was Teutates (figure 4), who was called Mars by the Romans. He personified the clear sky and protected a tribal community. (Teutatis is derived from Celtic word "tribe").

Besides Cernunnos (his stag horn symbolized his connections with the vegetable and animal kingdoms), there existed the related character. This was Smertrios or Ogmios, but the Romans named him Hercules. And Smertrius was an object of Taranis's hatred. The God of Thunder sent his terrible wolf to kill The Hero (figure 5). Besides, Taranis sent the dogs to capture a sacrificial calf of Smertrius (figure 6). But The Hero would always win.

There is an agreement between the ideas of Hatt and Golan. Celtic Taranis can correlate with the air image of The Underworld Lord. Cernunnos and Smertrius resemble with The Earth God and The Cultural Hero, suffering from anger of Taranis (persecuted by The Lord of Underworld). Wellknown plot of the Ancient Orient art presents Bull, being tormented by Lion.

One should mention that Hatt and Golan have got different scientific interests. The first scholar suggested an original reconstruction of Celtic mythology. Golan have tried to restore some world mythology structure, the sources of which he found in "the religion of Neolithic Age". But I am interested in the problem of correlation of the certain divinities and myths in the Indo-European civilisation. Therefore as the "sceleton" of pagan tradition has been outlined, one has to investigate its local variants.

First, let us consider the transformations of Celtic divinities in Christianised Irish sagas. Taranis disappiared. Onwards the sky thunder is connected with Christian god. But Cernunnos is presented as the personification of Otherworld (not Underworld!). In the sagas he is named "Daghdhda", "Good god". This epithet corresponds to another name of Cernunnos - "Esus". The identity of Dahghda and Cernunnos is supported by a Gallo-Roman relief, showing three herons standing on a bull back (figure 7). It is known, that three herons symbolized Brighid, Dahghda's daughter. The Great Goddess was named Goddess Danu. Celtic Teutates is transformed into Irish Nuadha deprived of the sky function (like Taranis), but keeping his kingship.

The character of Smertrius-Ogmios divided into two divinities. The first, who kept the name Oghma, was considered a great hero and the creator of paganish letters. The second (Lugh) has became the keeper of mystery knowledge. Ancient Romans (who comprehended the Barbarian mythologies better than some people usually think), identified Lugh withHermes/Mercury. It is an important item of information, because ancient sources identified Hermes/Mercury also with Wodan (Odin). Consequently, we can identify Lugh and the Germanic-Scandinavian lord of the dead warriors' world.

According to "Elder Edda" Odin created runic letters. And therefore we can compare him with Oghma and ancient Smertrius. Comparing Celtic and Germanic-Scandinavian mythologies one should remember the hostility of terrible wolves to Odin and Smertrius. According to Hatt, on the surface Gundestrup claudron Taranis was represented as the master of the wolf. He is like Thor of the Scandinavian pantheon. However, in the Northlands Odin became king of gods. Perhaps it was connected with the idea of Odin as the ancestor of Germanic tribes and kings. (According to Edda, Odin created mankind. "Historia Britonum" reports that Woden was many Saxon leaders' progenitor. At last, Odin was reputed to be the ancestor of the ancient Danish dynasty of the Volsungs). When this character become the Scandinavian pantheon chief, Thor turned into his son. But the traces of the hostility between these divinities remained. Possibily Fenrir wolf killing Odin, in an older variant of Scandinavian myth also belonged to The God of Thunder (like Celtic tradition). Why did the latter hate The Cultural Hero? His hatred was probably caused by the relationship between The Hero and The God of Earth, or by the fact that The Hero had stolen some treasure or knowledge.

The bronze matrice from Torslunda (Oland, 8-th c. a.d. - figure 7) shows a warrior with two spears and a wolf-man wounding him by a spear in the heel. It gives rise to a new question. In "Edda" Odin's death is described differently. Probably, this is also an older variant of the myth.

The representation on the matrice from Torslunda belongs to the so-called "dancing warrior" type. This type was widely spreaded widely in the Vendel and Viking periods of art. (See the helmets from Walsgarde - figure 8, 9, 10). We can see an interesting detail - the dancing warriors wearing horns. If they symbolize Odin, what does this detail meen? In terms of our hypothesis, the horns are the attribute of The God of Earth. Perhaps a risen Odin's character included this attributes. It is confirmed by the comparison with Celtic tradition. Cernunnos was accompanied by animals (a stag, a serpent, a bull). Odin is connected with the World Tree and the some animals: a horse, deer, ravens. On the gold horn from Hallechus (figure 11) the deer attacked by dogs is near the dancing warriors. These representations are like the representations on the wellknown claudron from Gundestrup. Esus (who was one of the peronifications of Cernunnos) accepted sacrifice hanging on a tree (as well as Odin). Once Odin sacrificed himself. He had been hanging on the World Tree for 9 days and nights.

So on the basis of these findings I suggest the following types of Indo-European gods: The God of Thunder, The God of Earth Powers, The God of Sky, The Great Goddess and The Cultural Hero (or simply The Hero). Some of these divinities merged into the united character or inversely divided into several gods, but it is natural, as the religion systems developed during centures and milleniums. Now we shall verify this hypothesis on the mythological material of other Indo-European cultures.

In ancient Greece The Sky God was named "Zeus". This name is correlated with Teutat and Tyr (Tiwaz) and also Balt Dievas, Indian Dyaus. All these names are connected with Indo-European foundation "deino" - "daies sky". The thunderous function was acquired by Zeus later. His wife Hera is one of The Great Goddess's personifications. The Greek god of Otherworld was Hades. However in ancient Greece there was other god connected with natural power of the earth, the animal and vegetable kingdoms. He is more vivid than fruitless Hades. This is Dionysus. The united type of The Cultural Hero is divided into several characters. These are Prometeus, the creator of mankind (The god of Thunder - Zeus made him suuffer a lot); Heracles (fighting against a terrible dog Cerberus) and some other. But Odin/Lugh was identified by ancient authors with Hermes/Merkury. Possibly this is not accidental, and basically The Hero was the guide of souls into Otherworld. There are Greek reliefs showing Hermes with a ramhead phallus (the ramhead snake is a typical attribute of Cernunnos. May be, this creature is an embodiment of The Cultural Hero, as the ancestor of mankind). On a Romano-Gaulish stelae Hermes was depicted on the left from Cernunnos (figure 12). And the representation of Hermes with young Dionysus is also not accidentally. The Greeks remembered about the relationship between The Cultural Hero and The God of Earth Powers. Both of them were connected with herds. Hermes's son Pan took part in Dionysus's Festival. On some ancient reliefs (4-th century B. C.) Pan is depicted sitting with his legs crossed (It is the typical pose of Cernunnos). And Dionysos wearing ram horns was also depicted often. He was venerated by orphics as horned serpent Sagreus, who turned into a bull and was torn to pieces by titans.

There are a similar characters in Indian mythology. Indra, The God of Thunder and Dyaus, The Sky God existed separately. The whole image character of The Great Goddess have not remained, although Kali Durga and Prthivi discented from her. The possessor of natural power Rudra was The God of Earth Powers. One of Rudra's ephithets is Pasupati, "the master of cattle". Possibly, this character originated from representations on the sighns of Indus civilisation (figure 13). The divinity supported with animals on this sign and resembls Celtic Cernunnos (figure 2). Then Rudra became one of the great medieval god Civa's names. But there was another related character in Veda. In a wellknown myth Indra and his dog Sarama (dog again!) set free heaven cows and defeated Vala, who concealed the cows in a cave. (It is interesting, that according to a Greek myth, Hermes also stole the cows).

As for The Cultural Hero, Manu and Yama - the sons of Vivasvat are quite suitable for this role. Manu was reputed as the progenitor and the ruler of mankind. In terms of the same tradition Yama was the first dead man and the ruler of ancestors. In ancient Iran these two divinities merged into an united character. This is Yima, a legendary king of the Golden Age. (His prototype is the first man and the master of the first bull. According to Russian scholars V. Ivanov and V. Toporov, Scandinavian giant Ymir with his cow Audumla and also Imra - a demiurge of the relict Aryan pagans of Hindu Kush associate with this theme).

In Slav and Balt folklores we can also see the similar examples. Above-mentioned Balt Dievas is typical variation of The Sky God. Balt Vels and Slav Veles have got a resemblance with Indian Vala not only in their names. These gods stole the cattles of the thunder gods Percunas and Perun accordingly and suffered a persecute. Due to Lithuanian dualistic legends and some other sources we know about a complicated relationship between Vels and the wolf. Vels was a bridge builder and a musician (like Pan, who played the pipe). We have got the plot of tempting Percunas's wife (Zemyna), turned into a chtonic goddess after her moral fall (She was tempted by Vels). At least, Boyan - a legendary Russian story-teller was named "the Veles's grandson". Veles was considered also as god of forest, abundance and the dead.

Lithuanian guide of souls into Otherworld was Sovius. Like Indian Yama, he became the first deñeased and the cremation custom founder. As for Slavs, their folklore preserved such an interesting personage as Yarila (West Slaw Herovit). At spring festivals in open streets, on puplic holidays organised in his honour a youth, wearing a wreath of ears and riding on a white horse, played the part of Yarila. Besides, in autumn Yarila's funeral was celibrated. (This personage was shown then as a representation of an old man with an enormous phall). We can see, that Yarila has got attributes of a dying and rising from the dead divinity. As an ancestor, he is like Dazhbog.

Dazhbog was the god of good and light. He was considered to be the ancestor of the ancient Russians. Dazhbog/Yarila is interesting as a horseman (figure 14). It is important, because the most well-known character of Thracian religion is also a horsemen. Usually he is called "Thracian Hero", or simply "Hero".

"Thracian Hero" was compared with Greek Heracles. The plaques from Letnitsa (4-th B. C., figure 15) show this character as a great hunter, the lord of animals, great drinker and tribal progenitor. By the way, the design of some plaques is like the design of the Vendel period helmet plaques (figure 8, 9, 10) and some Etruscan reliefs (figure 17). At least many Scythian idols in phallic forms represent male figures in the poses of rider. Some scholars think them to be representations of dead rulers, others suggest some mythical characters (for instance - Scithian ancestor Kolaksay or even Slav Dazhbog). But these points of view do not contradict each other.

It may be noted that this Indo-European scheme influenced Ob-Ugrian beliefs. Especially such an interesting Vogul mythical character as Mir-Susne-Hum - "The Man, Who Supervises The World" (figure 18). He is a national hero of the Ob-Ugrians (the Voguls and Ostyaks), their totem. Mir-Susne-Hum rides on a horse with eight wings. He is a wanderer, mediator and has got a resemblance with Scandinavian Odin.

So, I have investigated the principal mythological structure of the Indo-European peoples. The advantages of this research are: firstly - the widest grasp of various traditions; secondly - a comparison between artefacts relating to one and the same tradition but in different epoches; thirdly - application of texts and artefacts.

The obtained results confirm the principal ideas of Golan and Hatt. An extraordinary stability of the basical mythological types have been shown. The Cultural Hero's pecularities, his character origins and transformations have accounted for. In terms of this study some problems can be solved, for example: the origin of Odin/ Daghdha and some other gods; the interpretations of numerous ancient art objects. At last some lost mythological fragments can be reconstructed. My research gives rise to the following interesting questions: is it possible to deduce the divinity characters of Light, Sea, Craftmanship, Love and so on from the above-mentioned basical types or not?; why did different Indo-European peoples endow different types of gods with super power (in spite of the fact that the general mythological structure remained the same)? It is the widest field for ethnical mentality investigations. Unfortunately, in consequence of this article brevity, I can not state the complete chain of my conclusions. I can intend only, that the knowledge of one's tradition and the neighbors' tradition allows for man to realize his role in exchanging world. The past must be to address to the future.

 

.

 This is a map of structure of basic Indo-European pantheons (in Europe) according to my conceptions. Circle means type the God of Sky. Square means the type of the Great Goddess. Upper triangle means the type of the God of Thunder. Under triangle means the type of the God of Earth Powers. Rhomb means the type of the Cultural Hero. Pointer with one tip is feature of birth one divinity from other; hand with two tips is feature of resemblance these divinities; double line is feature of marriage.

 

Alex Fantalov.

 

CULTURE of BARBAROUS EUROPE:

TYPOLOGY of MYTHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS

 

Chapter 2. Mythological characters of West European barbarians

 

2.3. Mythological images in Germanic-Scandinavian culture

Images of gods in the Scandinavian mythological texts.

The Scandinavian mythological tradition fixed in 13 century gives us rather full list of the gods well identified to similar images of parallel mythological traditions. At the same time, specificity of the given mythology is shown in extreme growth of an image of the Hero and a little "novelistic" by the approach to a statement of many myths.

The god of the Clear Sky (legislative function) is Tyr. On alt-Germanic his name sounded "Tiw", that corresponds Greek Zeus , Indian Dyaus, Balt Dievas, Hittite Tiwat, Etruscan Tin, Gallic Teutat . However Tyr (similarly to Irish double Nuadu) it is not treated in references as the heavenly god. He has kept (and that not completely) a role of the patron of breeding collective. As in ancient German culture the full member of a tribe the man - soldier was, Tyr has got additional function of the god of war. He was also the patron of the military right connected with judicial process on ting (assembly of members of a tribe).

The god of Thunder who is carrying out power function, in the Scandinavian mythology, certainly, is Scandinavian Thor . To him corresponds Germanic Donner. In both "Edda" Thor the opponent World the Serpent behaves as a mighty warrior, he fights against giants and monsters. Pays on itself his familiarity to people that is not absolutely typical for Thunder god.

The god of Earth Powers at Scandinavian peoples was Freyr, embody vegetation, a crop, riches, the world. His images include features of phallic cult. In antiquity Freyr was very significant deity, however, in "Edda" he does not play an independent role. Many characteristics of the God of Earth Powers were incorporated by Odin that proves to be true on an example of comparison with Celtic tradition. Famous epithet Odin - "All father" corresponds to nickname Dahghda - " Father of all ". Cernunnos it is surrounded with animals. Odin also, according to"Edda" it is connected to animals: a horse, dears, and ravens. The victims which have been hung up on a tree were devoted to Gaulish Hes. Odin also accepted similar victims, but he has gone further and himself has sacrificed to himself, having hung nine days and night on World Tree. Freyr has got only rudimentary features: a mention of how he has killed deer horn of giant Beli (compare. History with Merlin), and also figurine Freyr from Rellinge - without horns, but with the crossed legs (in pose Cernunnos) and with the big phallus (ill. 25.).

Odin - the Cultural Hero (German Wotan, Anglo-Saxon Woden) - has occupied the Supreme position in Scandinavian pantheon. His grandiose image was considered variously. The most simple treatment - "the Supreme god", is more complex - "the god of war", is even deeper - "Apparently, Wodan in genesis - a chthonic demon, the patron of the military unions and military initiation and the god - sorcerer (shaman)." (Myths of nations of the world, 1998. ò. 2, 241).

Very important for us the certificate ancient Romans, identifying Wotan with Hermes /Mercury. What has served as the reason of similar identification? Hermes

in Greek mythology the patron of wanderers, a conductor of souls died was the bulletin of gods. In last quality, he "... Carries out one of the most ancient functions of a conductor of souls died in Hades, "psyhopomp" or the assistant for a way to an empire dead (Hom. Od. 24 1 - 5). Hermes belongs to both worlds - lives and death; he is mediator meanwhile and another, as well as the mediator between gods and people. <...> His guidance on lives and death it is reinterpreted in epoch of classical mythology as protection heroes. <...> During late antiquity there was Hermes-trismegist image ("three times the greatest One") in connection with affinity Hermes to the Otherworld; with this image occult sciences and Hermetic (secret, closed, accessible only devoted) compositions" (Myths of nations of the world, 1998. ò. 1, 292 - 293). Hermes has also function of the patron of herds. The given image has come and in mythology of Etruscans where existed at once relatives of the character - Herme and Turms. As if to Roman Mercury it is considered, that he originally was the god of trade and has enriched the symbolics after merge of the cult to cult Hermes.

One of major Odinn's functions was collecting souls died (but it is extreme the heroes falling in fight) in illusive palace Valhalla. He patronised brave warriors even at their live. But also the Scandinavian god has cunning and insidiousness in not a smaller degree, than Hermes. Odin was the reason of destruction of many heroes to which helped before (Sigmund, Helge, Heirred). "Danish king Harald has received the plan of military actions and the promise of numerous victories from the god. However during fight, Odin has taken his place of chariot man and has ruined Harald. In reply to a question why he has denuded promised good luck, One has answered, that "the grey wolf observes of halls of gods" (Coterell, 1997, 215). Words these partly explain perfidy of the Scandinavian god. Expecting the future fight with monstrous forces of chaos, he by all means aspired to collect in Valhalla as much as possible famous heroes. From myths we know about Odin and as about mediator. He has extracted in the world of shadows secret runes and took away from giants of honey of poetry. He goes down in the underground world and wakens from mortal dream Vala - sheprophet that she has told about destinies of the world ("Edda"). The image of the Odin-wanderer is important also, which even under the description (a raincoat, the staff, a hat) is similar Hermes.

Comparison Odin to the Greek god bears in it the big sense. You see to Hermes/Mercury the Romans equated and Celt Lugh. Means, comparison Lugh and Scandinavian owner of Valhalla is pertinent. G. Dumezil has paid attention to similarity of the Irish pair: Nuadha - Lugh and Scandinavian - Tyr - Odin. In the first case king of Tribes of Goddess Danu Nuadha in fight has lost a hand and was compelled to concede a throne to Lugh (for the sacred person of the monarch should not have physical defects). In the second - Tyr has lost his right hand in a mouth of the World Fenrir. "And consequently Tyr one-armed, and do not call his peacemaker" (Edda, 1970, 45). Both traditions have concurrence and in military attributes of considered(examined) characters. Weapon of Nuadha and Lugh the sword, weapon of Lugh and Odinn was a spear.

Odinn, being the founder of pagan fleeces and the patron of poets is close as well Oghma. And it shows that it is possible to compare to the big share of confidence Scandinavian got with ancient Celtic Smertrius. Their similarity presence at the Scandinavian god of the military function absent at Hermes speaks. Actually, it is possible to speak about two versions of the Cultural Hero: the intermediary between the worlds and the legendary hero. Probably, in genesis both they are consequence of splitting of a uniform image of progenitor. Hermes has not kept functions of an ancestor and soldier (there was Heracles in Greece, a hero and the founder of many dynasties and peoples, in pre-classic and Roman epoch esteemed as the god). Nevertheless, is primary name Hermes was translated as "phallus" (from here clearly image Hermes with ramheaded phallus, snakes as his symbol and presence of the Greek god near to Cernunnos on a monument from Rheims). One in the multilateral cult combined the basic part of symbolics of the Cultural Hero. For the benefit of a generality of origin Odin and Smertrius/Oghma enmity to them speaks both also monstrous wolves. Smertrius has won his opponent. But Odin was swallowed by World Wolf Fenrir in final fight. In opinion Hatt, the owner wolf-man, represented on the boiler from Gundestrup was Thunder god ( Celt Taranis ). However, in the Scandinavian pantheon Odin's role has extremely grown. This could be promoted partly by treatment of lord of Valhall as ancestor of some German peoples and leaders. (Eddic Odin has created primary people. Saxon historian Vidukind informed, that the god of the Saxes Woden connected to world pillar Herminsul, had a reputation for a primogenitor of the Hermyons. Probably, it is local variant of World Tree. Further, Halfred Monmut wrote that Woden was an ancestor of Saxon leaders Hengist and Hors. To Odin erected the genealogy and Danish royal dynasty. At last, he was considered as the founder of legendary dynasty of Velsungs (and an ancestor of greatest hero Sigurd

- as Lugh

was father of Ireland Cuchulain).

As, Odin became the chapter of the Scandinavian pantheon Thor has turned to his son. But, despite of it, the echo of animosities between them was kept. Odin cleverly and angrily scoffs above Thor, worth on the other coast of the river (the concept of lord Valhall, is here too important as the carrier - boatman - we shall recollect Greek Haron). Perhaps, wolf Fenrir - Odin's murderer, in initial variant of the Germanic-Scandinavian myths, also belonged to Thunder god?

Speaking about eshatology of ancient Scandinavians, it is necessary to mention that it finds out surprising similarity to similar plots of Zoroastrian Iran. Edda informs that "giant winter" which will come at the end of times. Chthonic monsters - World Wolf Fenrir and World Serpent Jormungand leaves the chasms and will be set on the world of gods. Giants will join them and demonic Loki, released from fetters. The gods and falling heroes from retinue Odin will beat against monsters and will win, but thus the majority of them will be lost.

According to Persian sacral texts ("Frashegird") there will be great disasters at last centuries of the world. All wolves will be left together and will merge in one huge wolf. People will beat with it and will win. After centuries, all snakes will be slipped together and will grow together in the huge snake. And again, people will battle to it and will win. Will pass years and held down in a muzzle of a volcano Demavend threheaded serpeent Aji-dahaka, former is no time shah, will break off circuits and will escape on light. Then Supreme god Ahuramazda call up great warrior Keresaspa and that will strike a monster. Then Dives and other demons will be destroyed.

Scandinavian and ancient Persian cultures have a line of the similar moments and besides eschatology. The plot about gold of dwarf Andvari, paid by gods is widely known as the repayment for death of his son, killed in an image of an otter. The damnation (the given plot has served as a begining to a history about Sigurd (Siegfried) and Nibelung) was imposed on this gold. And in Zoroastrian Iran above all animals the otter - "a water dog" was esteemed. For murder of an otter severe compensation in case of which default the person was cursed was imposed.

But the attention and one fundamental psychological difference of the Iranian and Scandinavian mythology pays to itself. It is in the field of morals. Great sin for ancient Persians was the lie. Therefore, their shahs tried to not break already the made peace contracts (than, by the way, used the Romans, having concerning fidelity to agreements more free representations). As the guarantor of observance of the contract god Mitra - Indo-Iranian variant of the Cultural Hero acted. Scandinavians were not so scrupulous in the given question, and as we saw, an example in it their own Cultural Hero - Odin submitted.

The great Goddess of ancient Germanics was Nertus. In "Germany", Tacitus describes her cult. A statue of the goddess kept in a sacred grove, and only priest could come there. In certain time Nertus put on a chariot, harnessed with bulls, and carried through all country. These days all wars stopped, and general fun because this goddess named "Terra Mater", returned fertility to the world began. Then the chariot and its contents were cleared in sacred lake, and ritual was so confidential, that slaves carrying out it after were betraid death. (Davidson, 1967,74).

Name Nertus is not known from the Scandinavian sources. As reflections of the Great Goddess can be considered Erd, Frigg, Freyja and even Valkyrie . Erd, whose name is meant with the ground, it is considered mother Scandinavian Thor . It is more about her it is not known. Frigg - "Beloved" was Odinn's wife and the goddess of a marriage, love, the family center. She had gift of a prediction. Frigg to some extent it is possible to correlate with Greek Hera (the same as Erd with Greek Gaia ). Like Hera, Frigg argued with the regal spouse and sometimes took above him top. According to "The History of Langobards" by Paul Diakon, in war between the Langobards and the Vandals, Frigg is helped the Langobards, and by Odinn to the Vandals. Due to cunning of the goddess, the Langobards have won.

Freyja ("Mistress") was as a matter of fact double of Frigg. She was considered as the wife the Odd (probably, variant of Odinn). Unlikely Frigg, Freyja in "Edda" concerns to Vanir - small group of gods of fertility, and is Freyr's sister. She embodied fertility, love, and beauty. Forage of that, the goddess daily divides and chooses together with Odin killed warriors. As representative of Vanir, Freyja had knowledge of magic (from Asir Odin owned to it only). There are in Scandinavia groups of women, venerated her cult, were considered owning as prophetical force. It is no wonder, that Christians considered their as witches, no less than itself Freyja, drives on a chariot, harnessed with cats.

2.3. Mythological characters in Germanic-Scandinavian culture

Images of gods in the Scandinavian mythological art.

Menu

 

 For consultations or tutoring: history, political science, cultural science, art criticism, painting and theories of composition; purchase of pictures and also installing of advertising - E-mail: fantalov@hotmail.com